Print Email Facebook Twitter Comparison of different evaporation estimates over the African continent Title Comparison of different evaporation estimates over the African continent Author Trambauer, P. Dutra, E. Maskey, S. Werner, M. Pappenberger, F. Van Beek, L.P.H. Uhlenbrook, S. Faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences Department Water Management Date 2013-07-02 Abstract Evaporation is a key process in the water cycle, with implications ranging from water management, to weather forecast and climate change assessments. The estimation of continental evaporation fluxes is complex and typically relies on continental-scale hydrological or land-surface models. However, it appears that most global or continental-scale hydrological models underestimate evaporative fluxes in some regions of Africa, and as a result overestimate stream flow. Other studies suggest that land-surface models may overestimate evaporative fluxes. In this study, we computed actual evaporation for the African continent using a continental version of the global hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB, which is based on a water balance approach. Results are compared with other independently computed evaporation products: the evaporation results from the ECMWF reanalysis ERA-Interim and ERA-Land (both based on the energy balance approach), the MOD16 evaporation product, and the GLEAM product. Three other alternative versions of the PCR-GLOBWB hydrological model were also considered. This resulted in eight products of actual evaporation, which were compared in distinct regions of the African continent spanning different climatic regimes. Annual totals, spatial patterns and seasonality were studied and compared through visual inspection and statistical methods. The comparison shows that the representation of irrigation areas has an insignificant contribution to the actual evaporation at a continental scale with a 0.5° spatial resolution. The choice of meteorological forcing data has a larger effect on the evaporation results, especially in the case of the precipitation input as different precipitation input resulted in significantly different evaporation in some of the studied regions. ERA-Interim evaporation is generally the highest of the selected products followed by ERA-Land evaporation. The satellite based products (GLEAM and MOD16) do not show regular behaviour when compared to the other products, though this depends on the region and the season considered. The results from this study allow for a better understanding of the differences between products in each climatic region. Through an improved understanding of the causes of differences between these products and their uncertainty, this study provides information to improve the quality of evaporation products for the African continent and, consequently, leads to improved water resources assessments at regional scale. To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:265f3685-5b6a-4c0d-bdaa-97471720e3d8 DOI https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-8421-2013 Publisher European Geosciences Union ISSN 1812-2108 Source Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10 (7), 2013 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2013 The Author(s)CC Attribution 3.0 License Files PDF Uhlenbrook_2013.pdf 5.09 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:265f3685-5b6a-4c0d-bdaa-97471720e3d8/datastream/OBJ/view