Print Email Facebook Twitter The Impact of Perioperative Remote Patient Monitoring on Clinical Staff Workflows Title The Impact of Perioperative Remote Patient Monitoring on Clinical Staff Workflows: Scoping Review Author León, Maria Alejandra (Student TU Delft) Pannunzio, V. (TU Delft Methodologie en Organisatie van Design) Kleinsmann, M.S. (TU Delft Methodologie en Organisatie van Design) Date 2022 Abstract Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions are being increasingly implemented in health care environments, given their benefits for different stakeholders. However, the effects of these interventions on the workflow of clinical staff are not always considered in RPM research and practice. Objective: This review explored how contemporary RPM interventions affect clinical staff and their workflows in perioperative settings. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of recent articles reporting the impact of RPM interventions implemented in perioperative settings on clinical staff and their workflow. The databases accessed were Embase and PubMed. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify the main problems and advantages that RPM brings to staff, in addition to the approaches taken to evaluate the impact of those interventions. Different themes were identified in terms of the challenges of RPM for clinical staff as well as in terms of benefits, risk-reduction strategies, and methods for measuring the impact of these interventions on the workflow of clinical staff. Results: A total of 1063 papers were found during the initial search, of which 21 (1.98%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 21 included papers, 15 (71%) focused on evaluating new RPM systems, 4 (19%) focused on existing systems, and 2 (10%) were reviews. Conclusions: The reviewed literature shows that the impact on staff work experience is a crucial factor to consider when developing and implementing RPM interventions in perioperative settings. However, we noticed both underdevelopment and lack of standardization in the methods for assessing the impact of these interventions on clinical staff and their workflow. On the basis of the reviewed literature, we recommend the development of more robust methods for evaluating the impact of RPM interventions on staff experience in perioperative care; the adoption of a stronger focus on transition management when introducing these interventions in clinical practice; and the inclusion of longer periods of assessment, including the evaluation of long-term goals. Subject mobile phonenursesperioperative careperioperative medicinephysiciansremote patient monitoringtelehealthtelemonitoringworkflow To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:d85704c7-a32b-45c0-a289-87c0853af1ec DOI https://doi.org/10.2196/37204 ISSN 2292-9495 Source JMIR Human Factors, 9 (2) Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type review Rights © 2022 Maria Alejandra León, V. Pannunzio, M.S. Kleinsmann Files PDF PDF.pdf 632.46 KB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:d85704c7-a32b-45c0-a289-87c0853af1ec/datastream/OBJ/view