Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion: Future Scenarios

Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion: Future Scenarios

Faludi, A.
Peyrony, J.

OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment

OTB Research

2011-09-26

The Barca Report advocates for developmental policies to be ‘place-based’: integrated as far as they affect ‘places’. The debate on territorial cohesion is equally concerned with integrating relevant policies and actions. This requires well-established democratic institutions and adequate responses to the demands of technical systems and of markets. Following Lisbeth Hooghe and Gary Marks, the respective arrangements are described as Governance Type I and Type II. All levels of government, including that of the EU, partake in both types, but relations between them are problematic, particularly in the context of Europe 2020: Will this EU strategy be mainly a matter for Directorate-Generals and their various clients pursuing their policies (Governance Type II), or will Cohesion policy, with its more integrated and decentralised approach, involving many levels of government and stakeholders (Governance Type I) form platforms for integrating them? This paper presents four scenarios; each based on a combination of strong/weak Governance Type I and Type II, which are labelled as the ‘Anglo-Saxon’, ‘Saint-Simonian’, ‘Rhineland’ and the ‘European’ Scenarios. The authors prefer the latter, but the best one can hope for in the short term is for this option not to fall by the wayside.

cohesion policy
place-based policies
territorial cohesion
scenarios

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:7bd17eaf-6803-4254-9b6d-5288d19cb3f6

Nordregio

1650-9544

European Journal of Spatial Development, (43), 2011; Refereed Article

Institutional Repository

journal article

(c) 2011 Faludi, A.
Peyrony, J.