"uuid","repository link","title","author","contributor","publication year","abstract","subject topic","language","publication type","publisher","isbn","issn","patent","patent status","bibliographic note","access restriction","embargo date","faculty","department","research group","programme","project","coordinates" "uuid:6351529f-fd6e-4860-9d5c-29c5ef21c979","http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6351529f-fd6e-4860-9d5c-29c5ef21c979","Comparison of mechanical properties of silicone and PVC (polyvinylchloride) cosmetic gloves for articulating hand prostheses","Smit, G.; Plettenburg, D.H.","","2013","Current articulating electric and body-powered hands have a lower pinch force (15–34 N) than electric hands with stiff fingers (55–100 N). The cosmetic glove, which covers a hand prosthesis, negatively affects the mechanical efficiency of a prosthesis. The goal of this study is to mechanically compare polyvinylchloride (PVC) and silicone cosmetic gloves and quantify the stiffness of the finger joints, the required actuation energy, and the energy dissipation during joint articulation. Six cosmetic gloves, identical in size but made from different materials, were mechanically tested: three PVC and three silicone. The silicone gloves required less work and dissipated less energy during flexing. They also had a lower joint stiffness and required a lower maximum joint torque. Based on energy requirements, joint stiffness, and required joint torque, the tested silicone glove is most suitable for application on an articulating hand prosthesis.","body powered; efficiency; hysteresis; prosthetic design; prosthetic evaluation; prosthetic hand; cosmetic glove; silocone glove; pvc glove; handprothese; handprothesen; armprothese; armprothesen; kunstledematen; upper limb","en","journal article","U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","","","","","","","","Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering","BioMechanical Engineering","","","",""