Searched for: author:"Visser, W.M."
(1 - 4 of 4)
document
Visser, W.M. (author)
The research reported on in this thesis is part of a larger research project that aims to develop a negotiation support system called the Pocket Negotiator. This thesis focuses on the question how such a system can represent and reason about a user’s preferences between the possible outcomes of a negotiation. In real-world negotiations, there...
doctoral thesis 2012
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
In the context of practical reasoning, such as decision making and negotiation, it is necessary to model preferences over possible outcomes. Such preferences usually depend on multiple criteria. We argue that the criteria by which outcomes are evaluated should be the satisfaction of a person’s underlying interests: the more an outcome satisfies...
conference paper 2011
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain...
conference paper 2011
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain...
conference paper 2011
Searched for: author:"Visser, W.M."
(1 - 4 of 4)