While drought impacts are widespread across the globe, climate change projections indicate more frequent and severe droughts. This underscores the pressing need to increase resistance and resilience to drought. The strategic application of Preventive Drought Management Measures (PDMMs) is a suitable avenue to reduce the likelihood of drought and ameliorate associated damages. In this study, we use an optimisation approach with a multicriteria decision-making method to allocate PDMMs for reducing the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts. The results indicate that implementing PDMMs can reduce the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts, and the obtained management scenarios (solutions) highlight the utility of multi-objective optimisation for PDMMs planning. However, examined management scenarios also illustrate the trade-off between managing agricultural and hydrological droughts. PDMMs can alleviate the severity of agricultural droughts while producing opposite effects for hydrological droughts (or vice versa). Furthermore, the impact of PDMMs displays temporal and spatial variabilities. For instance, PDMMs implementation within a specific subbasin may mitigate the severity of one type of drought in a given month yet exacerbate drought conditions in preceding or subsequent months. In the case of hydrological droughts, the PDMMs may intensify streamflow deficits in the intervened subbasins while alleviating the hydrological drought severity downstream (or vice versa). These complexities emphasise a customised implementation of PDMMs, considering the basin characteristics (e.g., rainfall distribution over the year, soil properties, land use, and topography) and the quantification of PDMMs' effect on the severity of each type of drought.

@en

While drought impacts are widespread across the globe, climate change projections indicate more frequent and severe droughts. This underscores the pressing need to increase resistance and resilience to drought. The strategic application of Preventive Drought Management Measures (PDMMs) is a suitable avenue to reduce the likelihood of drought and ameliorate associated damages. In this study, we use an optimisation approach with a multicriteria decision-making method to allocate PDMMs for reducing the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts. The results indicate that implementing PDMMs can reduce the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts, and the obtained management scenarios (solutions) highlight the utility of multi-objective optimisation for PDMMs planning. However, examined management scenarios also illustrate the trade-off between managing agricultural and hydrological droughts. PDMMs can alleviate the severity of agricultural droughts while producing opposite effects for hydrological droughts (or vice versa). Furthermore, the impact of PDMMs displays temporal and spatial variabilities. For instance, PDMMs implementation within a specific subbasin may mitigate the severity of one type of drought in a given month yet exacerbate drought conditions in preceding or subsequent months. In the case of hydrological droughts, the PDMMs may intensify streamflow deficits in the intervened subbasins while alleviating the hydrological drought severity downstream (or vice versa). These complexities emphasise a customised implementation of PDMMs, considering the basin characteristics (e.g., rainfall distribution over the year, soil properties, land use, and topography) and the quantification of PDMMs' effect on the severity of each type of drought.

@en

The typical drivers of drought events are lower than normal precipitation and/or higher than normal evaporation. The region's characteristics may enhance or alleviate the severity of these events. Evaluating the combined effect of the multiple factors influencing droughts requires innovative approaches. This study applies hydrological modelling and a machine learning tool to assess the relationship between hydroclimatic characteristics and the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts. The Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is used for hydrological modelling. Model outputs, soil moisture and streamflow, are used to calculate two drought indices, namely the Soil Moisture Deficit Index and the Standardized Streamflow Index. Then, drought indices are utilised to identify the agricultural and hydrological drought events during the analysis period, and the index categories are employed to describe their severity. Finally, the multivariate regression tree technique is applied to assess the relationship between hydroclimatic characteristics and the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts.

Our research indicates that multiple parameters influence the severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts in the Cesar River basin. The upper part of the river valley is very susceptible to agricultural and hydrological drought. Precipitation shortfalls and high potential evapotranspiration drive severe agricultural drought, whereas limited precipitation influences severe hydrological drought. In the middle part of the river, inadequate rainfall partitioning and an unbalanced water cycle that favours water loss through evapotranspiration and limits percolation cause severe agricultural and hydrological drought conditions. Finally, droughts are moderate in the basin's southern part (Zapatosa marsh and the Serranía del Perijá foothills). Moderate sensitivity to agricultural and hydrological droughts is related to the capacity of the subbasins to retain water, which lowers evapotranspiration losses and promotes percolation. Results show that the presented methodology, combining hydrological modelling and a machine learning tool, provides valuable information about the interplay between the hydroclimatic factors that influence drought severity in the Cesar River basin.@en