Brain imaging data are increasingly made publicly accessible, and volumetric imaging measures derived from population-based cohorts may serve as normative data for individual patient diagnostic assessment. Yet, these normative cohorts are usually not a perfect reflection of a patient's base population, nor are imaging parameters such as field strength or scanner type similar. In this proof of principle study, we assessed differences between reference curves of subcortical structure volumes of normal controls derived from two population-based studies and a case-control study. We assessed the impact of any differences on individual assessment of brain structure volumes. Percentile curves were fitted on the three healthy cohorts. Next, percentile values for these subcortical structures for individual patients from these three cohorts, 91 mild cognitive impairment and 95 Alzheimer's disease cases and patients from the Alzheimer Center, were calculated, based on the distributions of each of the three cohorts. Overall, we found that the subcortical volume normative data from these cohorts are highly interchangeable, suggesting more flexibility in clinical implementation.

@en

Image registration is an important task in medical image analysis. Whereas most methods are designed for the registration of two images (pairwise registration), there is an increasing interest in simultaneously aligning more than two images using groupwise registration. Multimodal registration in a groupwise setting remains difficult, due to the lack of generally applicable similarity metrics. In this work, a novel similarity metric for such groupwise registration problems is proposed. The metric calculates the sum of the conditional entropy between each image in the group and a representative template image constructed iteratively using principal component analysis. The proposed metric is validated in extensive experiments on synthetic and intrasubject clinical image data. These experiments showed equivalent or improved registration accuracy compared to other state-of-the-art (dis)similarity metrics and improved transformation consistency compared to pairwise mutual information.

@en

The most widespread technique used to register sets of medical images consists of selecting one image as fixed reference, to which all remaining images are successively registered. This pairwise scheme requires one optimization procedure per pair of images to register. Pairwise mutual information is a common dissimilarity measure applied to a large variety of datasets. Alternative methods, called groupwise registrations, have been presented to register two or more images in a single optimization procedure, without the need of a reference image. Given the success of mutual information in pairwise registration, we adapt one of its multivariate versions, called total correlation, in a groupwise context. We justify the choice of total correlation among other multivariate versions of mutual information, and provide full implementation details. The resulting total correlation measure is remarkably close to measures previously proposed by Huizinga et al. based on principal component analysis. Our experiments, performed on five quantitative imaging datasets and on a dynamic CT imaging dataset, show that total correlation yields registration results that are comparable to Huizinga’s methods. Total correlation has the advantage of being theoretically justified, while the measures of Huizinga et al. were designed empirically. Additionally, total correlation offers an alternative to pairwise mutual information on quantitative imaging datasets.@en

Brain connectivity is increasingly being studied using connectomes. Typical structural connectome definitions do not directly take white matter pathology into account. Presumably, pathology impedes signal transmission along fibres, leading to a reduction in function. In order to directly study disconnection and localize pathology within the connectome, we present the disconnectome, which only considers fibres that intersect with white matter pathology. To show the potential of the disconnectome in brain studies, we showed in a cohort of 4199 adults with varying loads of white matter lesions (WMLs) that: (1) Disconnection is not a function of streamline density; (2) Hubs are more affected by WMLs than peripheral nodes; (3) Connections between hubs are more severely and frequently affected by WMLs than other connection types; and (4) Connections between region clusters are often more severely affected than those within clusters.

@en

In quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI), quantitative tissue properties can be estimated by fitting a signal model to the voxel intensities of a series of images acquired with different settings. To obtain reliable quantitative measures, it is necessary that the qMRI images are spatially aligned so that a given voxel corresponds in all images to the same anatomical location. The objective of the present study is to describe and evaluate a novel automatic groupwise registration technique using a dissimilarity metric based on an approximated form of total correlation. The proposed registration method is applied to five qMRI datasets of various anatomical locations, and the obtained registration performances are compared to these of a conventional pairwise registration based on mutual information. The results show that groupwise total correlation yields better registration performances than pairwise mutual information. This study also establishes that the formulation of approximated total correlation is quite analogous to two other groupwise metrics based on principal component analysis (PCA). Registration performances of total correlation and these two PCA-based techniques are therefore compared. The results show that total correlation yields performances that are analogous to these of the PCAbased techniques. However, compared to these PCA-based metrics, total correlation has two main advantages. Firstly, it is directly derived from a multivariate form of mutual information, while the PCA-based metrics were obtained empirically. Secondly, total correlation has the advantage of requiring no user-defined parameter.@en