We think of architecture as an additive or accumulative process: a process where elements are added in order to create architecture. After you lay a brick, you lay another. But architecture can also be seen as subtractive, where portions of volume are removed to clarify an entity
...
We think of architecture as an additive or accumulative process: a process where elements are added in order to create architecture. After you lay a brick, you lay another. But architecture can also be seen as subtractive, where portions of volume are removed to clarify an entity. In architecture school we learn how to create a building; to create something out of nothing. During my studies I started to get interested in a way of thinking of architecture in reverse, doing the opposite. To do a proposal for preservation and activation of empty space. To recognize empty space as a complex, multi-layered reality. In this graduation project I elaborate on this concept of subtraction. In which creating is still the essence, but instead of creating something out of nothing, something is being created out of the existing. I felt like the act of subtraction within the spatial environment has not been studied extensivelly. There is a relevance to reveal the potential of substraction as an act within our discipline. Therefore I collected relevant reading in this booklet. It started more as a sculptural fascination and exploration, and it developed towards a multilayered study — where I also explored and discovered a meaning of the act, the making, of subtraction. And therefore I call this project: Poetics of Subtraction.