Structural Dynamics of Intra-Organisational Inventor Networks and their Influence on Innovation Output

A Patent-based longitudinal analysis

Master Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

S. Rajamanikam (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Contributor(s)

A.C. Smit – Mentor (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

A.P. Afghari – Mentor (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
24-04-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Management of Technology (MoT)
Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Downloads counter
41
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Intra-organisational inventor networks are continuously reshaped by project assignments, team restructuring, and geographic expansion, yet most research treats network structure as static and examines closure and brokerage in isolation from the spatial contexts in which they operate. This study asks how year-to-year changes in closure and brokerage within intra-organisational inventor networks influence firm-level innovative output, and how spatial dispersion moderates these relationships. Drawing on a 50-year panel of urban mining and WEEE recycling patents (1970 to 2020) spanning 572 firms, fixed-effects Poisson model estimated via quasi-maximum likelihood are estimated to examine the directional effects of structural change on patent counts. Changes in closure exhibit a robust inverted-U effect on innovative output, with the turning point falling within the observed sample range, and this effect is largely independent of geographic context. Changes in brokerage yield monotone positive returns whose magnitude is amplified by geographic dispersion in the primary FE-Poisson model specification, though this moderation is sensitive to model choice, while the amplification disappears for co-located firms, yielding flat associations. These findings demonstrate that closure and brokerage are temporally and spatially asymmetric mechanisms that must be modelled and managed independently. Together, they reframe the R&D network design problem from one of optimal structure to one of optimal structural trajectory.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 24-04-2028