1 |
|
Initiating mechanisms of food allergy: Oral tolerance versus allergic sensitization
Immediately after birth the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, which represents the greatest body surface area exposed to the outside environment, is confronted with a large variety of foreign antigens. The immune system of the intestine now has to meet the task of discriminating between pathogens and harmless antigens, such as food proteins and commensal bacteria, and to respond accordingly. This important job is fulfilled by cells of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, the largest immunologic organ in the body. Despite the large extent of food antigen exposure, only a small percentage of individuals experience adverse immunologic reactions to food. This is due to the fact that the normal immune response to dietary proteins is associated with the induction of oral tolerance, which refers to a state of active inhibition of immune responses to an antigen by means of prior exposure to that antigen via the oral route. Abrogation of oral tolerance or failure to induce oral tolerance may result in the development of food hypersensitivity. In the present review, factors that may play a role in the outcome of oral tolerance versus sensitization to food proteins are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
|
[Abstract]
|
2 |
|
Food allergy: What do we learn from animal models?
Purpose of review This review summarizes selected articles on animal models of food allergy published in 2003. The research areas that are covered include mechanistic studies, the search for new therapies, as well as screening models for hazard identification of potential allergens. Recent findings Novel treatment options of both prevention and therapeutic strategies have been reported with promising results. The induction of de-sensitization to food proteins was achieved by exposure to a mixture of recombinant food allergens and T helper 1 (Th1)-skewing bacterial components. Furthermore, research in animal models has provided new insights into the role of protein structure, digestion, and gut permeability in sensitization and tolerance induction to food proteins. The Th2 hypothesis of food allergy was tested in mouse strains, linking genetic susceptibility to sensitization with differential Th1-Th2 responses. In this context, the role of the liver in development of food antigen-specific Th2 cells, and the importance of costimulatory molecules in Th2 skewing were demonstrated. Finally, rodent models to predict potential allergenicity of novel foods have been further developed using different routes of sensitization. Summary Currently, several animal models of food allergy are used, including mouse, rat, swine, and dog. Continuing research in these models may elucidate the immunological mechanisms that underlie the sensitization and challenge phase of food allergy and may result in improved therapeutic options. Furthermore, the development of animal models to predict relative allergenicity of novel foods remains an important topic.
|
[Abstract]
|
3 |
|
Mixed antibody and T cell responses to peanut and the peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6 in an oral sensitization model
article |
2004
|
Author: |
Wijk, F. van
·
Hartgring, S.
·
Koppelman, S.J.
·
Pieters, R.
·
Knippels, L.M.J.
|
Keywords: |
Biology · Food technology · Cytokines · Oral mouse model · Peanut allergens · Peanut hyper-sensitivity · Sensitization · Th1/Th2 responses · antibody · cholera toxin · cytokine · food allergen · gamma interferon · immunoglobulin E · immunoglobulin G1 · immunoglobulin G2a · interleukin 10 · interleukin 4 · interleukin 5 · protein Ara h 1 · protein Ara h 2 · protein Ara h 3 · protein Ara h 6 · unclassified drug · anaphylaxis · animal cell · animal experiment · animal model · antibody detection · antibody response · article · controlled study · cytokine production · disease model · exposure · female · humoral immunity · immune response · mouse · nonhuman · peanut · peanut allergy · priority journal · sensitization · serum · spleen · T lymphocyte · Th1 cell · Th2 cell · Administration, Oral · Allergens · Animals · Arachis hypogaea · Cells, Cultured · Cytokines · Disease Models, Animal · Female · Glycoproteins · Immunoglobulin A · Immunoglobulin E · Immunoglobulin G · Immunoglobulins · Mice · Mice, Inbred C3H · Peanut Hypersensitivity · Plant Proteins · Spleen · T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer · Th1 Cells · Th2 Cells
|
Background: Peanut allergy is known for its severity and persistence through life. Several peanut proteins have been identified as allergenic and are indicated as Ara h 1-7. Very little is known about the mechanisms that underlie sensitization to peanut proteins. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to reveal the immune responses that are induced against peanut and the peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6 during sensitization, including the very early responses. Methods: Humoral and T cell responses against peanut and the peanut allergens were examined in an early and later stage of sensitization in an established murine model of peanut anaphylaxis. Therefore C3H/HeJ mice were orally exposed to two different doses of peanut extract plus cholera toxin. Results: Oral sensitization to peanut was characterized by an antigen-induced mixed cytokine response in the spleen (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and IFN-γ), which could already be observed 7 days after the onset of exposure. Additionally, polyisotypic humoral responses (IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a) against peanut were found in the serum. Moreover, we demonstrated that these T helper (Th)1/Th2 cytokine and antibody responses were also directed specifically against the major peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6. Conclusions: This study implicates that both Th1 and Th2 phenomena are involved in the development of peanut allergy in the C3H/HeJ murine model. Furthermore, we show that the present oral model is suitable to examine immune responses to food allergens during different stages of sensitization upon treatment with a whole food extract.
|
[Abstract]
|
4 |
|
CD4+CD25+ T cells regulate the intensity of hypersensitivity responses to peanut, but are not decisive in the induction of oral sensitization
article |
2007
|
Author: |
Wijk, F. van
·
Wehrens, E.J.M.
·
Nierkens, S.
·
Boon, L.
·
Kasran, A.
·
Pieters, R.
·
Knippels, L.M.J.
|
Keywords: |
Nutrition · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · Allergic sensitization · CD25+ regulatory T cells · Oral tolerance · Peanut allergy · CD4+ CD25+ T lymphocyte · sensitization · Administration, Oral · Animals · Cells, Cultured · Cytokines · Female · Immune Tolerance · Immunoglobulin E · Immunoglobulin G · Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit · Lymphocyte Depletion · Mice · Mice, Inbred C3H · Peanut Hypersensitivity · Plant Extracts · T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory
|
Background: Naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a critical role in the maintenance of self-tolerance and it has been suggested that these Tregs may also be involved in preventing allergic disease. Objective: The precise role of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the regulation of allergic responses to mucosal antigens remains to be elucidated. In the present study, it was investigated whether CD4 +CD25+ T cells are involved in the induction of oral tolerance and whether they play a role in controlling hypersensitivity responses to food proteins. Methods: CD4+CD25+ T cells were depleted with PC61 mAb before the induction of low dose oral tolerance to peanut extract (PE). In addition, CD4+CD25+ T cell depletion was performed during sensitization or before oral challenge, using a C3H/HeOuJ mouse model of allergic sensitization to peanut. Results: Oral tolerance to PE could not be induced in CD4+CD25+ T cell-depleted mice. However, CD4+CD25+ T cell depletion during long-term exposure to PE alone did not result in allergic sensitization. In sensitized mice, anti-CD25 treatment during oral exposure resulted in higher levels of PE-specific IgE and increased mast cell degranulation upon an oral challenge. In contrast, anti-CD25 treatment of PE-sensitized mice before oral challenges did not affect the level of mast cell degranulation. Conclusion: These results indicate that CD4+CD25+ Tregs are involved in maintaining tolerance to oral antigens and regulate the intensity of an IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity response, but are not crucial in preventing sensitization. Accordingly, CD4+CD25+ Tregs may represent a potential tool for the treatment of food allergic disorders. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
|
[Abstract]
|
5 |
|
The effect of the food matrix on In Vivo immune responses to purified peanut allergens
article |
2005
|
Author: |
Wijk, F. van
·
Nierkens, S.
·
Hassing, I.
·
Feijen, M.
·
Koppelman, S.J.
·
Jong, G.A.H. de
·
Pieters, R.
·
Knippels, L.M.J.
|
Keywords: |
Nutrition Toxicology · Food technology · Food matrix · Immunogenicity · Mouse model · Peanut allergens · allergen · cholera toxin · cytokine · immunoglobulin E · allergenicity · animal cell · animal experiment · antigen presenting cell · antigen purification · article · assay · cell count · controlled study · cytokine production · feeding · female · food allergy · foot pad · immune response · immunogenicity · immunoreactivity · immunostimulation · in vivo study · lymph node · mouse · mouse strain · nonhuman · peanut · Allergens · Animals · Antigens, CD · Antigens, CD80 · Antigens, CD86 · Arachis hypogaea · Cholera Toxin · Cytokines · Dietary Fats · Female · Glycoproteins · Immunoglobulin E · Immunoglobulin G · Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 · Lymph Nodes · Membrane Glycoproteins · Mice · Mice, Inbred BALB C · Mice, Inbred C3H · Peanut Hypersensitivity · Plant Proteins · Ara · Arachis hypogaea
|
There is little knowledge about the factors that determine the allergenicity of food proteins. One aspect that remains to be elucidated is the effect of the food matrix on immune responses to food proteins. To study the intrinsic immunogenicity of allergens and the influence of the food matrix, purified peanut allergens (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 or Ara h 6) and a whole peanut extract (PE) were tested in the popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA) and in an oral model of peanut hypersensitivity. In the PLNA, peanut proteins were injected into the hind footpad of BALB/ c mice; in the oral exposure experiments C3H/HeOuJ mice were gavaged weekly with PE or allergens in the presence of cholera toxin (CT). Upon footpad injection, none of the allergens induced significant immune activation. In contrast, PE induced an increase in cell number, cytokine production, and activation of antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, the presence of a food matrix enhanced the immune response to the individual allergens. Oral exposure to the purified allergens in the presence of CT induced specific IgE responses, irrespective of the presence of a food matrix. These results suggest that purified peanut allergens possess little intrinsic immune-stimulating capacity in contrast to a whole PE. Moreover, the data indicate that the food matrix can influence responses to individual proteins and, therefore, the food matrix must be taken into account when developing models for allergenic potential assessment. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved.
|
[Abstract]
|
6 |
|
CTLA-4 signaling regulates the intensity of hypersensitivity responses to food antigens, but is not decisive in the induction of sensitization
article |
2005
|
Author: |
Wijk, F. van
·
Hoeks, S.
·
Nierkens, S.
·
Koppelman, S.J.
·
Kooten, P. van
·
Boon, L.
·
Knippels, L.M.J.
·
Pieters, R.
|
Keywords: |
Nutrition toxicology · Food technology · cholera toxin · cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 · cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 monoclonal antibody · food allergen · food antigen · immunoglobulin E · monoclonal antibody · unclassified drug · animal cell · animal experiment · animal model · article · controlled study · cytokine production · female · hypersensitivity · mast cell degranulation · mouse · nonhuman · peanut allergy · priority journal · protein intake · regulatory mechanism · sensitization · signal transduction · Th2 cell · Adjuvants, Immunologic · Allergens · Animals · Antigens, CD · Antigens, Differentiation · Cytokines · Disease Models, Animal · Female · Immunoglobulin E · Mast Cells · Mice · Peanut Hypersensitivity · Signal Transduction · Th2 Cells
|
Although food allergy has emerged as a major health problem, the mechanisms that are decisive in the development of sensitization to dietary Ag remain largely unknown. CTLA-4 signaling negatively regulates immune activation, and may play a crucial role in preventing induction and/or progression of sensitization to food Ag. To elucidate the role of CTLA-4 signaling in responses to food allergens, a murine model of peanut allergy was used. During oral exposure to peanut protein extract (PPE) together with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT), which induces peanut allergy, CTLA-4 ligation was prevented using a CTLA-4 mAb. Additionally, the effect of inhibition of the CTLA-4 pathway on oral exposure to PPE in the absence of CT, which leads to unresponsiveness to peanut Ag, was explored. During sensitization, anti-CTLA-4 treatment considerably enhanced IgE responses to PPE and the peanut allergens, Ara h 1, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6, resulting in elevated mast cell degranulation upon an oral challenge. Remarkably, antagonizing CTLA-4 during exposure to PPE in the absence of CT resulted in significant induction of Th2 cytokines and an elevation in total serum IgE levels, but failed to induce allergen-specific IgE responses and mast cell degranulation upon a PPE challenge. These results indicate that CTLA-4 signaling is not the crucial factor in preventing sensitization to food allergens, but plays a pivotal role in regulating the intensity of a food allergic sensitization response. Furthermore, these data indicate that a profoundly Th2-biased cytokine environment is insufficient to induce allergic responses against dietary Ag.
|
[Abstract]
|
7 |
|
The CD28/CTLA-4-B7 signaling pathway is involved in both allergic sensitization and tolerance induction to orally administered peanut proteins
article |
2007
|
Author: |
Wijk, F. van
·
Nierkens, S.
·
Jong, W. de
·
Wehrens, E.J.M.
·
Boon, L.
·
Kooten, P. van
·
Knippels, L.M.J.
·
Pieters, R.
|
Keywords: |
Nutrition · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · Chymase · Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 · Immunoglobulin G1 · Immunoglobulin G2a · Peanut protein · Protein · Mouse · Peanut allergy · Sensitization · Signal transduction · T lymphocyte · T lymphocyte activation · Administration, Oral · Allergens · Animals · Antibodies, Blocking · Antigens, CD · Antigens, CD28 · Antigens, CD80 · Antigens, Differentiation · Arachis hypogaea · Cells, Cultured · Disease Models, Animal · Food Hypersensitivity · Immune Tolerance · Immunoconjugates · Immunoglobulin E · Ligands · Mice · Plant Extracts · Plant Proteins · Signal Transduction
|
Dendritic cells are believed to play an essential role in regulating the balance between immunogenic and tolerogenic responses to mucosal Ags by controlling T cell differentiation and activation via costimulatory and coinhibitory signals. The CD28/CTLA-4-CD80/CD86 signaling pathway appears to be one of the most important regulators of T cell responses but its exact role in responses to orally administered proteins remains to be elucidated. In the present study, the involvement of the CD28/CTLA-4-CD80/CD86 costimulatory pathway in the induction of allergic sensitization and oral tolerance to peanut proteins was investigated. In both an established C3H/HeOuJ mouse model of peanut hypersensitivity and an oral tolerance model to peanut, CB28/CTLA-4-CB80/CD86 interactions were blocked using the fusion protein CTLA-4Ig. To examine the relative contribution of CD80- and CD86-mediated costimulation in these models, anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 blocking Abs were used. In the hypersensitivity model, CTLA-4Ig treatment prevented the development of peanut extract-induced cytokine responses, peanut extract-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgE production and peanut extract-induced challenge responses. Blocking of CD80 reduced, whereas anti-CD86 treatment completely inhibited, the induction of peanut extract-specific IgE. Normal tolerance induction to peanut extract was found following CTLA-4Ig, anti-CD86, or anti-CD80 plus anti-CD86 treatment, whereas blockade of CB80 impaired the induction of oral tolerance. We show that CD28/CTLA-4-CD80/CD86 signaling is essential for the development of allergic responses to peanut and that CD86 interaction is most important in inducing peanut extract-specific IgE responses. Additionally, our data suggest that CD80 but not CD86 interaction with CTLA-4 is crucial for the induction of low dose tolerance to peanut. Copyright © 2007 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
|
[Abstract]
|