Repository hosted by TU Delft Library

Home · Contact · About · Disclaimer ·
 

Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM)

Publication files not online:

Author: Wendel de Joode, B. van · Vermeulen, R. · Hemmen, J.J. van · Fransman, W. · Kromhout, H.
Type:article
Date:2005
Institution: TNO Kwaliteit van Leven
Source:Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 9, 62, 623-632
Identifier: 238696
doi: doi:10.1136/oem.2004.018564
Keywords: Safety Chemistry · Food and Chemical Risk Analysis · Accuracy · Health survey · Industrial worker · Linear regression analysis · Skin allergy · Clothing · Environmental Monitoring · Forearm · Hazardous Substances · Humans · Leg · Observation · Observer Variation · Occupational Exposure · Questionnaires · Sensitivity and Specificity · Skin · Thorax · Huidziekten · Dermatosen · Metingen · Meetmethoden · Gevaarlijke stoffen

Abstract

Background: The authors recently developed a Dermal Exposure Assessment Method (DREAM), an observational semiquantitative method to assess dermal exposures by systematically evaluating exposure determinants using pre-assigned default values. Aim: To explore the accuracy of the DREAM method by comparing its estimates with quantitative dermal exposure measurements in several occupational settings. Methods: Occupational hygienists observed workers performing a certain task, whose exposure to chemical agents on skin or clothing was measured quantitatively simultaneously, and filled in the DREAM questionnaire. DREAM estimates were compared with measurement data by estimating Spearman correlation coefficients for each task and for individual observations. In addition, mixed linear regression models were used to study the effect of DREAM estimates on the variability in measured exposures between tasks, between workers, and from day to day. Results: For skin exposures, spearman correlation coefficients for individual observations ranged from 0.19 to 0.82. DREAM estimates for exposure levels on hands and forearms showed a fixed effect between and within surveys, explaining mainly between-task variance. In general, exposure levels on clothing layer were only predicted in a meaningful way by detailed DREAM estimates, which comprised detailed information on the concentration of the agent in the formulation to which exposure occurred. Conclusions: The authors expect that the DREAM method can be successfully applied for semiquantitative dermal exposure assessment in epidemiological and occupational hygiene surveys of groups of workers with considerable contrast in dermal exposure levels (variability between groups >1.0). For surveys with less contrasting exposure levels, quantitative dermal exposure measurements are preferable.