Repository hosted by TU Delft Library

Home · Contact · About · Disclaimer ·
 

The role of hazard- and risk-based approaches in ensuring food safety

Publication files not online:

Author: Barlow, S.M. · Boobis, A.R. · Bridges, J. · Cockburn, A. · Dekant, W. · Hepburn, P. · Houben, G.F. · König, J. · Nauta, M.J. · Schuermans, J. · Bánáti, D.
Type:article
Date:2015
Source:Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2, 46, 176-188
Identifier: 529836
doi: doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.10.007
Keywords: Safety · Food chemicals · Allergens · Chemical hazards · Decision making · Food microbiology · Food safety · Food supply · Hazards · Health risks · Laws and legislation · Microbiology · Microorganisms · Risk assessment · Risk management · Safety engineering · European union · Food allergen · Food legislation · Risk based approaches · Risk-based assessments · Risks to health · Safety of food · Value of risk · Chemical contamination · Food and Nutrition · Healthy Living · Life · RAPID - Risk Analysis for Products in Development · ELSS - Earth, Life and Social Sciences

Abstract

Background: Food legislation in the European Union and elsewhere includes both hazard- and risk-based approaches for ensuring safety. In hazard-based approaches, simply the presence of a potentially harmful agent at a detectable level in food is used as a basis for legislation and/or risk management action. Risk-based approaches allow consideration of exposure in assessing whether there may be unacceptable risks to health. Scope and approach: The advantages and disadvantages of hazard- and risk-based approaches for ensuring the safety of food chemicals, allergens, ingredients and microorganisms were explored at an ILSI Europe workshop. Key findings and conclusions: It was concluded that both types of approach have their place, depending on the context. However, problems can arise when both types of approach are used in regulation by separate agencies that address different aspects of the same agent/substance present in food. This separation of decision-making can result in hazard-based restrictions on marketing and use, whereas risk-based assessments for those exposed show there is reasonable certainty no harm will result. This in turn can lead to contradictory, confusing and ultimately unnecessary actions. Use of hazard-based approaches for foods also means that comparisons with benefits for nutrition and food security cannot be undertaken. This has the potential to lead to bias in the overall conclusions of regulators and risk managers, who may not have been presented with the benefits of particular foods. The value of risk-based approaches is becoming increasingly recognised. © 2015 ILSI Europe A.I.S.B.L.