Repository hosted by TU Delft Library

Home · Contact · About · Disclaimer ·
 

Performance assessment of black box capacity forecasting for multi-market trade application

Publication files not online:

Author: MacDougall, P. · Ran, B. · Huitema, G.B. · Deconinck, G.
Type:article
Date:2017
Publisher: MDPI AG
Source:Energies, 10, 10
Identifier: 788270
Article number: 1673
Keywords: Demand response · Electricity markets · Flexibility · Machine learning · Predictive trade · Virtual power plants · Artificial intelligence · Digital storage · Electric energy storage · Learning systems · Power markets · Sensitivity analysis · Computational constraints · Machine learning models · Virtual power plants · Virtual power plants (VPP) · Wholesale energy market · Commerce · 2016 ICT · MCS - Monitoring & Control Services · TS - Technical Sciences

Abstract

With the growth of renewable generated electricity in the energy mix, large energy storage and flexible demand, particularly aggregated demand response is becoming a front runner as a new participant in the wholesale energy markets. One of the biggest barriers for the integration of aggregator services into market participation is knowledge of the current and future flexible capacity. To calculate the available flexibility, the current aggregator pilot and simulation implementations use lower level measurements and device specifications. This type of implementation is not scalable due to computational constraints, as well as it could conflict with end user privacy rights. Black box machine learning approaches have been proven to accurately estimate the available capacity of a cluster of heating devices using only aggregated data. This study will investigate the accuracy of this approach when applied to a heterogeneous virtual power plant (VPP). Firstly, a sensitivity analysis of the machine learning model is performed when varying the underlying device makeup of the VPP. Further, the forecasted flexible capacity of a heterogeneous residential VPP was applied to a trade strategy, which maintains a day ahead schedule, as well as offers flexibility to the imbalance market. This performance is then compared when using the same strategy with no capacity forecasting, as well as perfect knowledge. It was shown that at most, the highest average error, regardless of the VPP makeup, was still less than 9%. Further, when applying the forecasted capacity to a trading strategy, 89%of the optimal performance can be met. This resulted in a reduction of monthly costs by approximately 20%. © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.