Repository hosted by TU Delft Library

Home · Contact · About · Disclaimer ·
 

Krachtvoer: Effect evaluation of a Dutch healthful diet promotion curriculum for lower vocational schools

Publication files not online:

Author: Martens, M.K. · Assema, P. van · Paulussen, T.G.W.M. · Breukelen, G. van · Brug, J.
Type:article
Date:2008
Institution: TNO Kwaliteit van Leven
Source:Public Health Nutrition, 3, 11, 271-278
Identifier: 240694
doi: doi:10.1017/S1368980007000298
Keywords: Health · Adolescents · Effect evaluation · Nutrition · article · controlled study · diet · fat intake · food intake · health program · health promotion · human · major clinical study · priority journal · regression analysis · vocational education · Adolescent · Adolescent Nutrition Physiology · Child Nutrition Sciences · Cluster Analysis · Diet · Dietary Fats · Female · Fruit · Health Promotion · Humans · Male · Netherlands · Questionnaires · Regression Analysis · Schools · Students · Healthy for Life · Healthy Living

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the behavioural effects of a school-based healthful diet promotion intervention implemented in lower vocational schools. Design: A cluster-randomised pre-test-post-test experimental design was used, and data were collected by means of written questionnaires. Setting: Students of 18 Dutch lower vocational schools. Subjects: The final sample consisted of 10 experimental schools with 13 teachers, 37 classes and 879 students, and eight control schools with 10 teachers, 31 classes and 734 students (total n = 1613). Results: Fixed regression analyses revealed beneficial effects on the behavioural measures relating to fruit intake (as assessed by a food frequency measure and fruit consumption during the previous day), and most behavioural measures related to high-fat snack intake (food frequency measure, and number of snacks and total fat intake from snacks during the previous day). The behavioural effects relating to breakfast habits were limited. Some positive behavioural effects occurred in the total target population, others mainly or only among students with more unfavourable intakes at baseline. Mixed regression analysis found comparable regression coefficients for the behavioural outcomes, but the effects related to fruit intake were no longer statistically significant. Conclusions: Although we did not find the expected effects on all outcome indicators, the total pattern of results suggest that Krachtvoer offered a surplus value over existing curricula. However, some programme elements need to be revised to improve effectiveness and prevent negative effects, and more information is needed about the long-term effects of the programme. © 2007 The Authors.