Mitigating the gradual change in water partitioning at the Pannerdense Kop bifurcation

Mitigating the gradual change in water partitioning at the Pannerdense Kop bifurcation

van den Brand, Siebe (TU Delft Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Schielen, R.M.J. (mentor)
Blom, A. (graduation committee)
van Denderen, P. (graduation committee)
Chowdhury, M. Kifayath (graduation committee)
Kok, M. (graduation committee)

Delft University of Technology

Civil Engineering | Hydraulic Engineering

2024-03-11

It is observed that the bed level development of the Pannerden Canal (PC) and the Waal changed since the peak flows of 1993, 1995 and 1998. The erosion rate of the Pannerden Canal decreased greatly just downstream of the bifurcation while the erosion rate of the Waal stayed more or less constant. This leads to an increasing depth of the Waal relative to the Pannerden Canal and therefore the Waal attracts more discharge. The model results from this study confirm that without anthropogenic interventions in the future, the Waal discharge fraction keeps increasing. The shift in discharge partitioning towards the Waal is an undesired development of the system as it causes problems for navigability, ecology, freshwater distribution and flood safety. Currently there is a lack of knowledge on how interventions can be used to mitigate the gradual change in discharge partitioning at the Pannerdense Kop (PK). This study aims at filling the knowledge gap by considering several interventions studying their effect on the discharge partitioning at the PK and on the Rhine branches surrounding the PK.

Firstly, an inventory of interventions which could possibly increase the Waal discharge fraction is made. The resulting selection of interventions is: A) a side channel from the Boven-Rijn towards the PC, B) fully opening the weirs in the NR-Lek, C) widening on the IJssel, D) directly steering the sediment partitioning at the PK and E) dredging in the PC and dumping in the Waal. These interventions are implemented in a 1D-morphological model of the Dutch Rhine branches.

It is found that the side channel from the Boven-Rijn to the PC (A) is not capable of significantly influencing the discharge partitioning at the PK. The backwater effects due to the water addition counteract the added discharge to the PC.

Furthermore, it is found that for the low Lobith discharges opening the weirs in the NR-Lek (B) can reduce the Waal discharge fraction below the initial value from the reference case for the whole simulated period of 60 years. The opening of the weirs does however lead to significant relative decrease in the IJssel discharge fraction which is unwanted regarding the freshwater supply of the IJsselmeer. For low Lobith discharges the widening on the IJssel (C) initially leads to a significant reduction in Waal discharge fraction of 2.4%. The effectivity reduces throughout the simulation because of aggradation along the widened reach. For high flows the opening of the weirs and the IJssel widening are less effective. The final relative Waal discharge fraction decrease is respectively 1.1% and 0.7%.

The results of the directly steering the sediment partitioning (D) are similar for high and low flows. The water level is not changed initially and therefore initially the discharge partitioning is not affected. Throughout the simulation the slope of the Waal adjusts to the increased sediment supply and the slope of the PC adjusts to the decreased sediment supply. For both flows the final relative decrease in Waal discharge fraction is 1.8%.

Dredging and dumping (E) shows similar effects on the bed level and discharge partitioning as steering the sediment partitioning at the PK. Dredging and dumping also does not alter the water level and the discharge partitioning initially. The relative bed level increase of the Waal is somewhat higher for the dredging and dumping simulation than for the simulation in which the sediment partitioning at the PK is steered. Therefore also the relative decrease in Waal discharge fraction is higher with 2.4% for the low Lobith flows and 2.2% for the high Lobith flows.

Currently the IRM program aims at stopping further skewing of the discharge partitioning of the PK. None of the interventions from this study is capable of realising this on its own. Therefore multiple river interventions will have to be combined to be able to reach the ambitions of IRM. The knowledge on the effect of the interventions on the discharge partitioning at the PK and the bed levels of the Dutch Rhine branches can be used as a basis for further study towards to combined effects of river interventions on the bed level development of the Dutch Rhine branches and the discharge partitioning at the PK.

Dutch Rhine
Discharge partitioning
River interventions
Morphology

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:41af2694-4f32-4249-ad45-da9215963963

Student theses

master thesis

© 2024 Siebe van den Brand