Searched for: author%3A%22Bosboom%2C+J.%22
(1 - 4 of 4)
document
Bosboom, J. (author), Mol, M. (author), Reniers, A.J.H.M. (author), Stive, M.J.F. (author), de Valk, C. F. (author)
Although commonly used for the validation of morphological predictions, point-wise accuracy metrics, such as the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), are not well suited to demonstrate the quality of a high-variability prediction; in the presence of (often inevitable) location errors, the comparison of depth values per grid point tends to favour...
journal article 2020
document
Bosboom, J. (author), Reniers, A.J.H.M. (author)
Although it is generally acknowledged that the practical predictability at smaller scales may be limited, output of high-resolution morphodynamic area models is mostly presented at the resolution of the computational grid. The so- presented fields typically are realistic looking, but not necessarily of similar quality at all spatial scales....
conference paper 2014
document
Bosboom, J. (author), Reniers, A.J.H.M. (author)
The accuracy of morphological predictions is generally measured by an overall point-wise metric, such as the mean-squared difference between pairs of predicted and observed bed levels. Unfortunately, point-wise accuracy metrics tend to favour featureless predictions over predictions whose features are (slightly) misplaced. From the perspective...
journal article 2014
document
Bosboom, J. (author), Reniers, A.J.H.M. (author)
The quality of a morphological prediction is often expressed by an overall grid-point based skill score based on the Mean Squared Error (MSE) between the predicted and observed bed levels (Sutherland et al., 2004). Although the MSE is a good measure of the overall error between model and observations, it tends to penalize rather than reward the...
conference paper 2013
Searched for: author%3A%22Bosboom%2C+J.%22
(1 - 4 of 4)