The BRT-LRT dilemma

A public transport users’ and policymakers’ perspective on differences in preferences and perceptions between BRT and LRT

Master thesis (2019)

Authors

A. Gaspardo Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Contributors

S.P. Hoogendoorn Transport and Planning (supervisor 1)
N. van Oort Transport and Planning - CEG (supervisor 1)
M. Kroesen Transport and Logistics - TPM (supervisor 1)
D. Ton Transport and Planning - CEG (supervisor 1)
Marson Jesus Royal HaskoningDHV (supervisor 1)
Barth Donners Royal HaskoningDHV (supervisor 1)
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright: © 2019 Alessio Gaspardo
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

01-11-2019

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Abstract

The discussion involving BRT and LRT is well alive among policymakers, who often rely on personal preferences or, as it is called in literature, on “blind commitment” towards one system or the other for their decision-making. The reason for choosing a system according to personal taste is also caused by the unknown preferences that public transport users have for the two systems. It is known from literature that there exists a “rail bonus”, but it is not clear to what extent this applies to LRT compared to BRT. Moreover, it is not known what are the causes behind the rail bonus black-box. This study wants to put some light on the dilemma by testing the existence of an “LRT bonus” and trying to explain it by analysing perceptions and how these relate to each other. Moreover, the study tries to understand how policymakers perceive BRT and LRT and how the decision-making should be done.