We’re currently testing a new search engine
Search in the TU Delft Repository Collections
TU Delft Repository
Recently Added Records
Editorial
Design for and with values in designing for social change (Design Ethics SIG)
This editorial introduces the theme track ‘Design for and with values in designing for social change’. Building on prior work that frame ethics as an invitation to care, the track focuse on values as a central construct in socially engaged design. It responds to a growing need to move beyond abstract value frameworks toward understanding how values are elicited, surfaced, negotiated, and enacted in practice. Drawing on 24 selected papers, we reveal a strongly interdisciplinary collection where participatory design emerges as a dominant method. The contributions are organized into four overlapping themes revolving around the concepts of power, methods, dignity and care. The track highlights both instrumental and critical approaches as well as top-down and bottom-up value articulations. With this, it emphasizes the importance of context, relationality, and reflexivity in socially engaged design.
We close this gap by assessing whether zero-shot stereo foundation models are suitable for stereo reconstruction in neurosurgical microscopy by analyzing their accuracy, robustness, and failure predictability. To this end, the Microscopy Images for Neurosurgical Dense Stereo reconstruction (MINDS) benchmark is introduced, which provides realistic synthetic and ex-vivo porcine brain images with reference depth and segmentation masks. Four zero-shot models and two classical reference methods are evaluated on MINDS for reconstruction accuracy and robustness under reflections, blur, and weak texture. Additionally, a failure predictor is developed from inference-time confidence cues to investigate whether unreliable depth estimates could be caught in practice.
The best classical method places 23% and 76% of pixels within 0.1 mm and 1 mm of the reference, respectively. The best zero-shot model reaches 59% and 97% at the same thresholds. This accuracy gap persists across all texture levels. Under specular reflection, the best zero-shot model stays at 55% and 99%, while the reference methods drop to 4% and 42%. Defocus blur, by contrast, degrades every tested method to a similar extent and remains the dominant barrier to sub-millimeter accuracy. The failure predictor separates reliable from unreliable pixels at an average precision of 0.63 on synthetic data, nearly four times the chance level of 0.17, with recall rising from 0.75 for errors of 1 mm to 5 mm to 0.99 for errors above 10 mm. Together, these results establish the present capabilities and limitations of zero-shot foundation models for neurosurgical stereo reconstruction.
...
We close this gap by assessing whether zero-shot stereo foundation models are suitable for stereo reconstruction in neurosurgical microscopy by analyzing their accuracy, robustness, and failure predictability. To this end, the Microscopy Images for Neurosurgical Dense Stereo reconstruction (MINDS) benchmark is introduced, which provides realistic synthetic and ex-vivo porcine brain images with reference depth and segmentation masks. Four zero-shot models and two classical reference methods are evaluated on MINDS for reconstruction accuracy and robustness under reflections, blur, and weak texture. Additionally, a failure predictor is developed from inference-time confidence cues to investigate whether unreliable depth estimates could be caught in practice.
The best classical method places 23% and 76% of pixels within 0.1 mm and 1 mm of the reference, respectively. The best zero-shot model reaches 59% and 97% at the same thresholds. This accuracy gap persists across all texture levels. Under specular reflection, the best zero-shot model stays at 55% and 99%, while the reference methods drop to 4% and 42%. Defocus blur, by contrast, degrades every tested method to a similar extent and remains the dominant barrier to sub-millimeter accuracy. The failure predictor separates reliable from unreliable pixels at an average precision of 0.63 on synthetic data, nearly four times the chance level of 0.17, with recall rising from 0.75 for errors of 1 mm to 5 mm to 0.99 for errors above 10 mm. Together, these results establish the present capabilities and limitations of zero-shot foundation models for neurosurgical stereo reconstruction.
T4G
Trace-based P4 Program Generation
...