Design of Deep Supported Excavations

Comparison Between Numerical and Empirical Methods

Conference paper (2015)
Copyright: © 2015 The Authors and IOS Press, Creative Commons CC-BY
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-580-7-482
Numerical analysis Design Eurocode 7 CIRIA C517 Props
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

15-10-2015

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the derivation of design prop loads for supported excavations in stiff clay with increasing excavation depth and number of prop levels. For multi-propped walls there are a number of empirical graphs to obtain the design prop forces. CIRIA C517 (Twine & Roscoe, 1999) enhancing Terzaghi & Peck's work (Terzaghi & Peck (1967) and Peck (1969)) and making it more relevant in the UK practice, suggests the Distributed Prop Load (DPL) method based on 81 case histories and field measurements of prop loads. Similar guidance and empirical graphs exist in other countries such as the EAB Recommendations in Germany (Recommendations on Excavations: EAB, 3rd Edition, 2014). The design prop loads derived by empirical graphs (both CIRIA and EAB which are widely used in the UK and Germany respectively) and Finite Element methods are compared in the context of Eurocode 7 requirements. The German recommendations give prop loads in better agreement with the numerical analysis results. Suggestions are made to update the CIRIA guidance in line with the German recommendations and give different shapes of pressure distribution for supported walls with different number of prop levels. This can result in more realistic predictions of prop loads for upper layers, particularly in deep excavations, and hence more economic design.