Water-Loss Management under Data Scarcity

Case Study in a Small Municipality in a Developing Country

Journal article (2020)

Authors

E. R. Oviedo-Ocaña Industrial University of Santander
I. C. Dominguez Industrial University of Santander
JP Celis Industrial University of Santander
L. C. Blanco Industrial University of Santander
I. Cotes Industrial University of Santander
S Ward University of the West of England
Z. Kapelan Sanitary Engineering - CEG
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering (CEG) (TU Delft)
Copyright: © 2020 E. R. Oviedo-Ocaña, I. C. Dominguez, J. Celis, L. C. Blanco, I. Cotes, S. Ward, Z. Kapelan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001162
Real losses Apparent losses Geographic information systems EPANET Distribution network Water-loss management
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

01-03-2020

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Civil Engineering & Geosciences

Department

Water Management

Research Group

Sanitary Engineering

Abstract

Urban areas are facing challenges for the provision of public services, with water scarcity arising as one of the main problems. A twin track approach of supply and demand management is essential, and water-loss management contributes to reducing water demand. However, small municipalities from developing countries have technical, information, and financial limitations to locate and monitor water losses. This paper presents the estimation of real and apparent losses in a small municipality from a developing country in a data-scarce situation. For this, several tools were used, allowing data integration that resulted in a water balance, from which water losses were estimated at 46%, and four alternatives for water-loss reduction were developed. A cost-benefit analysis and financial indicators were estimated for the proposed alternatives, resulting in a water savings of 19%, a payback period of 3 years and an internal rate of return of 39%. The proposed strategies have potential to improve water quantity and quality, the technical stability of the system, utility performance, and water security.