The growing number and growing size of wind energy projects coupled with the rapid growth in high-performance computing technology are driving researchers toward conducting large-scale simulations of the flow field surrounding entire wind farms. This requires highly parallel-efficient tools, given the large number of degrees of freedom involved in such simulations, and yields valuable insights into farm-scale physical phenomena, such as gravity wave interaction with the wind farm and farm–farm wake interactions. In the current study, we introduce the open-source, finite-volume, large-eddy simulation (LES) code TOSCA (Toolbox fOr Stratified Convective Atmospheres) and demonstrate its capabilities by simulating the flow around a finite-size wind farm immersed in a shallow, conventionally neutral boundary layer (CNBL), ultimately assessing gravity-wave-induced blockage effects. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated using a new hybrid off-line–concurrent-precursor method. Velocity is forced with a novel pressure controller that allows us to prescribe a desired average hub-height wind speed while avoiding inertial oscillations above the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) caused by the Coriolis force, a known problem in wind farm LES studies. Moreover, to eliminate the dependency of the potential-temperature profile evolution on the code architecture observed in previous studies, we introduce a method that allows us to maintain the mean potential-temperature profile constant throughout the precursor simulation. Furthermore, we highlight that different codes do not predict the same velocity inside the boundary layer under geostrophic forcing owing to their intrinsically different numerical dissipation. The proposed methodology allows us to reduce such spread by ensuring that inflow conditions produced from different codes feature the same hub wind and thermal stratification, regardless of the adopted precursor run time. Finally, validation of actuator line and disk models, CNBL evolution, and velocity profiles inside a periodic wind farm is also presented to assess TOSCA’s ability to model large-scale wind farm flows accurately and with high parallel efficiency.

The growth in the number and size of wind energy projects in the last decade has revealed structural limitations in the current approach adopted by the wind industry to assess potential wind farm sites. These limitations are the result of neglecting the mutual interaction of large wind farms and the thermally stratified atmospheric boundary layer. While currently available analytical models are sufficiently accurate to conduct site assessments for isolated rotors or small wind turbine clusters, the wind farm's interaction with the atmosphere cannot be neglected for large-size arrays. Specifically, the wind farm displaces the boundary layer vertically, triggering atmospheric gravity waves that induce large-scale horizontal pressure gradients. These perturbations in pressure alter the velocity field at the turbine locations, ultimately affecting global wind farm power production. The implication of such dynamics can also produce an extended blockage region upstream of the first turbines and a favorable pressure gradient inside the wind farm. In this paper, we present the multi-scale coupled (MSC) model, a novel approach that allows the simultaneous prediction of micro-scale effects occurring at the wind turbine scale, such as individual wake interactions and rotor induction, and meso-scale phenomena occurring at the wind farm scale and larger, such as atmospheric gravity waves. This is achieved by evaluating wake models on a spatially heterogeneous background velocity field obtained from a reduced-order meso-scale model. Verification of the MSC model is performed against two large-eddy simulations (LESs) with similar average inflow velocity profiles and a different capping inversion strength, so that two distinct interfacial gravity wave regimes are produced, i.e. subcritical and supercritical. Interfacial waves can produce high blockage in the first case, as they are allowed to propagate upstream. On the other hand, in the supercritical regime their propagation speed is less than their advection velocity, and upstream blockage is only operated by internal waves. The MSC model not only proves to successfully capture both local induction and global blockage effects in the two analyzed regimes, but also captures the interaction between the wind farm and gravity waves, underestimating wind farm power by about only 2ĝ€¯% compared with the LES results. Conversely, wake models alone cannot distinguish between differences in thermal stratification, even if combined with a local induction model. Specifically, they are affected by a first-row overprediction bias that leads to an overestimation of the wind farm power by 13ĝ€¯% to 20ĝ€¯% for the modeled regimes.