Objective: Wearable seizure detection devices could provide more reliable seizure documentation outside the hospital compared to seizure self-reporting by patients, which is the current standard. Previously, during the SeizeIT1 project, we studied seizure detection based on behind-the-ear electroencephalography (EEG). However, the obtained sensitivities were too low for practical use, because not all seizures are associated with typical ictal EEG patterns. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to develop a multimodal automated seizure detection algorithm integrating behind-the-ear EEG and electrocardiography (ECG) for detecting focal seizures. In this framework, we quantified the added value of ECG to behind-the-ear EEG. Methods: This study analyzed three multicenter databases consisting of 135 patients having focal epilepsy and a total of 896 seizures. A patient-specific multimodal automated seizure detection algorithm was developed using behind-the-ear/temporal EEG and single-lead ECG. The EEG and ECG data were processed separately using machine learning methods. A late integration approach was applied for fusing those predictions. Results: The multimodal algorithm outperformed the EEG-based algorithm in two of three databases, with an increase of 11% and 8% in sensitivity for the same false alarm rate. Significance: ECG can be of added value to an EEG-based seizure detection algorithm using only behind-the-ear/temporal lobe electrodes for patients with focal epilepsy.

Objective: Automated seizure detection is a key aspect of wearable seizure warning systems. As a result, the quality of life of refractory epilepsy patients could be improved. Most state-of-the-art algorithms for heart rate-based seizure detection use a so-called patient-independent approach, which do not take into account patient-specific data during algorithm training. Although such systems are easy to use in practice, they lead to many false detections as the ictal heart rate changes are patient-dependent. In practice, only a limited amount of accurately annotated patient data is typically available, which makes it difficult to create fully patient-specific algorithms. Methods: In this context, this study proposes for the first time a new transfer learning approach that allows to personalize heart rate-based seizure detection by using only a couple of days of data per patient. The algorithm was evaluated on 2,172 h of single-lead ECG data from 24 temporal lobe epilepsy patients including 227 focal impaired awareness seizures. Results: The proposed personalized approach resulted in an overall sensitivity of 71% with 1.9 false detections per hour. This is an average decrease in false detection rate of 37% compared to the reference patient-independent algorithm using only a limited amount of personal seizure data. The proposed transfer learning approach adapts faster and more robustly to patient-specific characteristics than other alternatives for personalization in the literature. Conclusion: The proposed method allows an easy implementable solution to personalize heart rate-based seizure detection, which can improve the quality of life of refractory epilepsy patients when used as part of a multimodal seizure detection system.

Objective: Seizure diaries kept by patients are unreliable. Automated electroencephalography (EEG)-based seizure detection systems are a useful support tool to objectively detect and register seizures during long-term video-EEG recording. However, this standard full scalp-EEG recording setup is of limited use outside the hospital, and a discreet, wearable device is needed for capturing seizures in the home setting. We are developing a wearable device that records EEG with behind-the-ear electrodes. In this study, we determined whether the recognition of ictal patterns using only behind-the-ear EEG channels is possible. Second, an automated seizure detection algorithm was developed using only those behind-the-ear EEG channels. Methods: Fifty-four patients with a total of 182 seizures, mostly temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 5284 hours of data, were recorded with a standard video-EEG at University Hospital Leuven. In addition, extra behind-the-ear EEG channels were recorded. First, a neurologist was asked to annotate behind-the-ear EEG segments containing selected seizure and nonseizure fragments. Second, a data-driven algorithm was developed using only behind-the-ear EEG. This algorithm was trained using data from other patients (patient-independent model) or from the same patient (patient-specific model). Results: The visual recognition study resulted in 65.7% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity. By using those seizure annotations, the automated algorithm obtained 64.1% sensitivity and 2.8 false-positive detections (FPs)/24 hours with the patient-independent model. The patient-specific model achieved 69.1% sensitivity and 0.49 FPs/24 hours. Significance: Visual recognition of ictal EEG patterns using only behind-the-ear EEG is possible in a significant number of patients with TLE. A patient-specific seizure detection algorithm using only behind-the-ear EEG was able to detect more seizures automatically than what patients typically report, with 0.49 FPs/24 hours. We conclude that a large number of refractory TLE patients can benefit from using this device.

We describe a patient with new-onset temporal lobe epilepsy during prolonged maintenance electroconvulsive therapy. We suggest a possible causal relationship with maintenance electroconvulsive therapy through electrical kindling of the temporal lobe.