AM

A. Brad Murray

info

Please Note

3 records found

A Cloud-Based, Open-Source, Python Framework with Interactive Notebooks for Statistical Analysis and Simulation of Coastal Climate Hazards in a Changing Climate

Book chapter (2026) - Laura Cagigal, Valvanuz Fernandez-Quiruelas, Meredith Leung, Mark Merrifield, John Marra, Borja G. Reguero, David Gutierrez-Barcelo, Ron Hoeke, Emilio Echevarria, José A.A. Antolinez, Giovanni Coco, Brad Murray, Fernando Méndez, Jayantha Obeysekera, Javier Tausia, Jared Ortiz-Angulo, Alba Ricondo, Paula Camus, Antonio S. Cofino, Dylan Anderson, Peter Ruggiero
Addressing global challenges such as coastal hazards and climate change requires innovative tools capable of analyzing complex environmental drivers, including waves, storm surges, and cyclones, across varying scales. These tools are vital for predicting floods, assessing risks, and planning adaptive responses. BlueMath-Hub has been developed as a global collaborative initiative to provide accessible, customizable solutions for both researchers and practitioners. It aims to simplify the use of advanced statistical and numerical models, fostering creative and scalable approaches in coastal science and engineering. BlueMath, the core of this platform, is an open-source repository of Python tools accessible via a cloud-based Jupyter Hub environment. It integrates statistical methods and numerical model wrappers within a modular framework. The system includes: (a) BlueMath-Toolkit, providing tools for data mining, interpolation, and model integration; (b) BlueMath-Statistical Downscaling, focusing on extreme events and generalized models; (c) BlueMath-Hybrid Downscaling, combining statistical and numerical approaches for optimized solutions; and (d) BlueMath-Climate Services, supporting integrated applications such as compound flooding assessments. BlueMath is continuously evolving, with its tools already applied in research, publications, and training. By lowering barriers to entry and enabling collaborative workflows, BlueMath-Hub supports the development of innovative solutions to mitigate the impacts of a changing climate. ...
Journal article (2020) - Jennifer Montaño, Giovanni Coco, Déborah Idier, Bonnie C. Ludka, Sina Masoud-Ansari, Fernando J. Méndez, A. Brad Murray, Nathaniel G. Plant, Katherine M. Ratliff, Arthur Robinet, Ana Rueda, Nadia Sénéchal, Jose A.A. Antolínez, Joshua A. Simmons, Kristen D. Splinter, Scott Stephens, Ian Townend, Sean Vitousek, Kilian Vos, Tomas Beuzen, Karin R. Bryan, Laura Cagigal, Bruno Castelle, Mark A. Davidson, Evan B. Goldstein, Raimundo Ibaceta
Beaches around the world continuously adjust to daily and seasonal changes in wave and tide conditions, which are themselves changing over longer time-scales. Different approaches to predict multi-year shoreline evolution have been implemented; however, robust and reliable predictions of shoreline evolution are still problematic even in short-term scenarios (shorter than decadal). Here we show results of a modelling competition, where 19 numerical models (a mix of established shoreline models and machine learning techniques) were tested using data collected for Tairua beach, New Zealand with 18 years of daily averaged alongshore shoreline position and beach rotation (orientation) data obtained from a camera system. In general, traditional shoreline models and machine learning techniques were able to reproduce shoreline changes during the calibration period (1999–2014) for normal conditions but some of the model struggled to predict extreme and fast oscillations. During the forecast period (unseen data, 2014–2017), both approaches showed a decrease in models’ capability to predict the shoreline position. This was more evident for some of the machine learning algorithms. A model ensemble performed better than individual models and enables assessment of uncertainties in model architecture. Research-coordinated approaches (e.g., modelling competitions) can fuel advances in predictive capabilities and provide a forum for the discussion about the advantages/disadvantages of available models. ...
Journal article (2018) - José Antonio A. Antolínez, A. Brad Murray, Fernando J. Méndez, Laura J. Moore, Graham Farley, James Wood
Shifts in the frequency of typical meteorological patterns in an ocean basin, over interannual to decadal time scales, cause shifts in the patterns of wave generation. Therefore, ocean basin-scale climate shifts produce shifts in the wave climates affecting the coastlines of the basin. We present a hybrid methodology for downscaling observed (or predicted) climate shifts into local nearshore wave climates and then into the associated coastline responses. A series of statistical analyses translate observed (or predicted) distributions of meteorological states into the deep water wave climate affecting a coastal region and dynamical modeling combined with statistical analyses transform the deep water wave climate into the nearshore wave climate affecting a particular coastline. Finally, dynamical modeling of coastline evolution hindcasts (or predicts) how coastline shapes respond to climate shifts. As a case study, we downscale from meteorological hindcast in the North Atlantic basin since 1870 to the responses of the shape of the coast of the Carolinas, USA. We test the hindcasts using shoreline change rates calculated from historical shorelines, because shifts in coastline shape equate to changes in the alongshore pattern of shoreline change rates from one historical period to another. Although limited by the availability of historical shorelines (and complicated by historical inlet openings), the observations are consistent with the predicted signal of ocean basin-scale climate change. The hybrid downscaling methodology, applied to the output of global climate models, can be used to help forecast future patterns of shoreline change related to future climate change scenarios. ...