To maximize effects of dorsal leaf ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) on gait in people with bilateral plantarflexor weakness, the AFO properties should be matched to the individual. However, how AFO properties interact regarding their effect on gait function is unknown. We studied the interaction of AFO bending stiffness with neutral angle and footplate stiffness on the effect of bending stiffness on walking energy cost, gait kinematics and kinetics in people with plantarflexor weakness by employing predictive simulations. Our simulation framework consisted of a planar 11 degrees of freedom model, containing 11 muscles activated by a reflex-based neuromuscular controller. The controller was optimized by a comprehensive cost function, predominantly minimizing walking energy cost. The AFO bending and footplate stiffness were modelled as torsional springs around the ankle and metatarsal joint. The neutral angle of the AFO was defined as the angle in the sagittal plane at which the moment of the ankle torsional spring was zero. Simulations without AFO and with AFO for 9 bending stiffnesses (0–14 Nm/degree), 3 neutral angles (0–3-6 degrees dorsiflexion) and 3 footplate stiffnesses (0–0.5–2.0 Nm/degree) were performed. When changing neutral angle towards dorsiflexion, a higher AFO bending stiffness minimized energy cost of walking and normalized joint kinematics and kinetics. Footplate stiffness mainly affected MTP joint kinematics and kinetics, while no systematic and only marginal effects on energy cost were found. In conclusion, the interaction of the AFO bending stiffness and neutral angle in bilateral plantarflexor weakness, suggests that these should both be considered together when matching AFO properties to the individual patient.@en

In children with cerebral palsy (CP), rigid ventral shell ankle-foot orthoses (vAFOs) are often prescribed to reduce excessive knee flexion in stance and lower the energy cost of walking (ECW). However, how vAFOs affect ECW is a complex issue, as vAFOs may have an impact on lower limb biomechanics, upper body movements, and balance. Besides, the vAFO's biomechanical effect have been shown to be dependent on its stiffness around the ankle joint. We examined whether vAFO stiffness influences trunk movements and gait stability in CP, and whether there is a relationship between these factors and ECW. Fifteen children with spastic CP were prescribed vAFOs. Stiffness was varied into a rigid, stiff and flexible configuration. At baseline (shoes-only) and for each vAFO stiffness configuration, 3D-gait analyses and ECW-tests were performed. From the gait analyses, we derived trunk tilt, lateroflexion, and rotation range of motion (RoM) and the mediolateral and anteroposterior Margins of Stability (MoS) and their variability as measures of gait stability. With the ECW-test we determined the netEC. We found that wearing vAFOs significantly increased trunk lateroflexion (Wald χ2 = 33.7, p < 0.001), rotation RoM (Wald χ2 = 20.5, p < 0.001) and mediolateral gait instability (Wald χ2 = 10.4, p = 0.016). The extent of these effects partly depended on the stiffness of the vAFO. Significant relations between trunk movements, gait stability and ECW were found r = 0.57–0.81, p < 0.05), which indicates that trunk movements and gait stability should be taken into account when prescribing vAFOs to improve gait in children with CP walking with excessive knee flexion.@en

Background: In individuals with unilateral plantar flexor weakness, the second peak of the vertical ground reaction force (GRF) is decreased. This leads to a higher ground reaction force, e.g. impact, of the contralateral leg, potentially explaining quadriceps muscle and/or knee joint pain. Energy cost optimized dorsal leaf ankle-foot-orthoses (AFOs) may increase the push-off ground reaction force, which in turn could lead to lower impact forces on the contralateral leg. Research questions: 1) Are impact forces increased in the contralateral leg of people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness compared to healthy subjects? 2) Do energy cost optimized AFOs reduce impact forces and improve leg impact symmetry compared to walking without AFO in people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness? Methods: Nine subjects with unilateral plantar flexor weakness were provided a dorsal leaf AFO with a stiffness primarily optimized for energy cost. Using 3D gait analyses peak vertical GRF during loading response with and without AFO, and the symmetry between the legs in peak GRF were calculated. Peak GRF and symmetry were compared with reference data of 23 healthy subjects. Results: The contralateral leg showed a significant higher peak vertical GRF (12.0 ± 0.9 vs 11.2 ± 0.6 N/kg, p = 0.005) compared to healthy reference data. When walking with AFO, the peak vertical GRF of the contralateral leg significantly reduced (from 12.0 ± 0.9 to 11.4 ± 0.7 N/kg, p = 0.017) and symmetry improved compared to no AFO (from 0.93 ± 0.06 to 1.01 ± 0.05, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In subjects with unilateral plantar flexor weakness, impact force on the contralateral leg was increased when compared to healthy subjects and dorsal leaf AFOs optimized for energy cost substantially reduced this force and improved impact symmetry when compared to walking without AFO. This indicates that dorsal leaf AFOs may reduce pain resulting from increased impact forces during gait in the contralateral leg in people with unilateral plantar flexor weakness.@en

Background: Bilateral plantarflexor muscle weakness is a common impairment in many neuromuscular diseases. However, the way in which severity of plantarflexor weakness affects gait in terms of walking energy cost and speed is not fully understood. Predictive simulations are an attractive alternative to human experiments as simulations allow systematic alterations in muscle weakness. However, simulations of pathological gait have not yet been validated against experimental data, limiting their applicability. Research question: Our first aim was to validate a predictive simulation framework for walking with bilateral plantarflexor weakness by comparing predicted gait against experimental gait data of patients with bilateral plantarflexor weakness. Secondly, we aimed to evaluate how incremental levels of bilateral plantarflexor weakness affect gait. Methods: We used a planar musculoskeletal model with 9 degrees of freedom and 9 Hill-type muscle-tendon units per leg. A state-dependent reflex-based controller optimized for a function combining energy cost, muscle activation squared and head acceleration was used to simulate gait. For validation, strength of the plantarflexors was reduced by 80 % and simulated gait compared with experimental data of 16 subjects with bilateral plantarflexor weakness. Subsequently, strength of the plantarflexors was reduced stepwise to evaluate its effect on gait kinematics and kinetics, walking energy cost and speed. Results: Simulations with 80 % weakness matched well with experimental hip and ankle kinematics and kinetics (R > 0.64), but less for knee kinetics (R < 0.55). With incremental strength reduction, especially beyond a reduction of 60 %, the maximal ankle moment and power decreased. Walking energy cost and speed showed a strong quadratic relation (R2>0.82) with plantarflexor strength. Significance: Our simulation framework predicted most gait changes due to bilateral plantarflexor weakness, and indicates that pathological gait features emerge especially when bilateral plantarflexor weakness exceeds 60 %. Our framework may support future research into the effect of pathologies or assistive devices on gait.@en