As contemporary quantum computers do not possess error correction, any calculation performed by these devices can be considered an involuntary approximation. To solve a problem on a quantum annealer, it has to be expressed as an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). In this work, we thus study whether systematically approximating QUBO representations of the MAX-3SAT problem can improve the solution quality when solved on contemporary quantum hardware, compared to using exact, non-approximated QUBO representations. For a MAX-3SAT instance consisting of a 3SAT formula with n variables and m clauses, we propose a method of systematically creating approximate QUBO representations of dimension (n× n), which is significantly smaller than the QUBO matrices of any exact, non-approximated MAX-3SAT QUBO transformation. In an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that using our QUBO approximations for solving MAX-3SAT problems on D-Wave's quantum annealer Advantage_System6.4 can yield better results than using state-of-the-art exact QUBO transformations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using naive QUBO approximation methods, based on removing values from exact (n+m)×(n+m)-dimensional QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT instances, is ineffective.

In this paper, we present an open-source Python framework, called satqubolib. This framework aims to provide all necessary tools for solving (MAX)-3SAT problems on quantum hardware systems via Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Our framework solves two major issues when solving (MAX)-3SAT instances in the context of quantum computing. Firstly, a common way of solving satisfiability instances with quantum methods is, to transform these instances into instances of QUBO, as QUBO is the input format for quantum annealers and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) on quantum gate systems. Studies have shown, that the choice of this transformation can significantly impact the solution quality of quantum hardware systems. Thus, our framework provides thousands of usable QUBO transformations for satisfiability problems. Doing so also enables practitioners from any domain to immediately explore and use quantum techniques as a potential solver for their domain-specific problems, as long as they can be encoded as satisfiability problems. As a second contribution, we created a dataset of 6000 practically hard and satisfiable SAT instances that are also small enough to be solved with current quantum(-hybrid) methods. This dataset enables meaningful benchmarking of new quantum, quantum-hybrid, and classical methods for solving satisfiability problems.

One way of solving 3sat instances on a quantum computer is to transform the 3sat instances into instances of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimizations (QUBOs), which can be used as an input for the QAOA algorithm on quantum gate systems or as an input for quantum annealers. This mapping is performed by a 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. Recently, it has been shown that the choice of the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation can significantly impact the solution quality of quantum annealing. It has been shown that the solution quality can vary up to an order of magnitude difference in the number of correct solutions received, depending solely on the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. An open question is: what causes these differences in the solution quality when solving 3sat-instances with different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations? To be able to conduct meaningful studies that assess the reasons for the differences in the performance, a larger number of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations would be needed. However, currently, there are only a few known 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and all of them were created manually by experts, who used time and clever reasoning to create these transformations. In this paper, we will solve this problem by proposing an algorithmic method that is able to create thousands of new and different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and thus enables researchers to systematically study the reasons for the significant difference in the performance of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations. Our algorithmic method is an exhaustive search procedure that exploits properties of (Formula presented.) dimensional pattern QUBOs, a concept which has been used implicitly in the creation of 3sat-to-QUBO transformations before, but was never described explicitly. We will thus also formally and explicitly introduce the concept of pattern QUBOs in this paper.

We introduce a novel approach to translate arbitrary 3-sat instances to Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (qubo) as they are used by quantum annealing (QA) or the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Our approach requires fewer couplings and fewer physical qubits than the current state-of-the-art, which results in higher solution quality. We verified the practical applicability of the approach by testing it on a D-Wave quantum annealer.

To solve 3sat instances on quantum annealers they need to be transformed to an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). When there are multiple transformations available, the question arises whether different transformations lead to differences in the obtained solution quality. Thus, in this paper we conduct an empirical benchmark study, in which we compare four structurally different QUBO transformations for the 3sat problem with regards to the solution quality on D-Wave’s Advantage_system4.1. We show that the choice of QUBO transformation can significantly impact the number of correct solutions the quantum annealer returns. Furthermore, we show that the size of a QUBO instance (i.e., the dimension of the QUBO matrix) is not a sufficient predictor for solution quality, as larger QUBO instances may produce better results than smaller QUBO instances for the same problem. We also empirically show that the number of different quadratic values of a QUBO instance, combined with their range, can significantly impact the solution quality.