Assistive lower-limb exoskeletons (LLEs) have been recognized as promising tools for enhancing physical capacity in stroke survivors. Involving end-users in the early development stages is essential to ensure these technologies meet user needs. Co-design approaches, which actively engage end-users, support this goal. This study aims to (1) evaluate the impact of fatigue on daily living, (2) identify activities that could benefit from LLE assistance, (3) outline design and usability requirements for home-based LLEs, and (4) define physical parameters LLEs should monitor and assess. Discussions were structured using the PERCEPT co-design methodology and thematically analyzed. Four chronic stroke survivors participated in three focus group sessions, each lasting approximately 2 hours. Fatigue was identified as a significant factor in daily life, underscoring the importance of assistive technologies, such as LLEs, to help mitigate exhaustion. Participants recognized LLEs as valuable tools for enhancing physical performance, with benefits for muscle strength, balance, fatigue management, coordination, and general mobility. Design considerations included system modularity, battery efficiency, ease of donning and doffing, and practical needs for daily use. Our findings offer valuable insights into stroke survivors’ design and usability concerns regarding LLEs and provide a foundation for advancing the development and adoption of new assistive technologies.

The science and technology of wearable robots are steadily advancing, and the use of such robots in our everyday life appears to be within reach. Nevertheless, widespread adoption of wearable robots should not be taken for granted, especially since many recent attempts to bring them to real-life applications resulted in mixed outcomes. The aim of this article is to address the current challenges that are limiting the application and wider adoption of wearable robots that are typically worn over the human body. We categorized the challenges into mechanical layout, actuation, sensing, body interface, control, human–robot interfacing and coadaptation, and benchmarking. For each category, we discuss specific challenges and the rationale for why solving them is important, followed by an overview of relevant recent works. We conclude with an opinion that summarizes possible solutions that could contribute to the wider adoption of wearable robots.