A new analytical equation for the electrophoretic mobility of a colloidal sphere, homogeneously charged, is derived. This equation reduces to the well-known Henry’s formulation for low surface potentials. For high surface potentials, the equation is compared to the full numerical result. It is found that the equation performs well up to surface potentials of 50 mV. For larger surface potentials, the equation performs well for 𝜅𝑎>10, where 𝜅 is the inverse of Debye’ s length and a the radius of the particle. Differences between analytical and numerical solutions for 𝜅𝑎<10 are studied. The case of a particle with a constant surface charge is discussed. In that case, a very simple equation relates the surface charge of the particle to the electrophoretic mobility for 𝜅𝑎>10.

Discrete element modelling of clays requires defining the interaction energy between two particles. The Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory combining the effect of the van der Waals forces and the Coulombic forces due to the double layer of counterions provides a widely accepted framework to characterise the pair potential energy. Solutions of the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equation to quantify the Coulombic forces are only available for the case of infinitely extended and uniformly charged facing plates (1D conditions). However, these assumptions are not representative of a clay particle system. Particles should be represented by platelets of finite size and finite thickness, with different charges between the edge and the basal planes. This paper addresses the problem of deriving the Coulombic interaction forces for plates of finite size and thickness in 3D configuration by solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation numerically via the Finite Element Method (FEM). It is shown that 2D particles (plates of infinitesimal thickness) provide an adequate representation of Coulombic interaction as long as the particles are uniformly charged. The advantage of 2D particles is to reconcile numerical modelling with analytical solutions available in the literature. The use of 2D particles is questionable when considering different charges between basal planes and edges.