Mv

M.A. van den Berg

info

Please Note

2 records found

Journal article (2026) - M. A. van den Berg, E. Panfilov, S. M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, J. H. Krijthe, R. Agricola, A. Tiulpin
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is typically studied in isolated joints, but humans are interconnected systems. This raises the question of how multi-joint OA manifests, and whether it forms a distinct subgroup. This study aimed to investigate whether individuals with OA worsening in both the hip and the knee exhibit unique clinical, structural, or demographic characteristics compared to those with isolated OA worsening or no worsening. Design: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, including 1958 participants with radiographic assessments of hip and knee joints at baseline and 48-month follow-up. Participants were categorized into four groups based on joint space narrowing: no worsening, hip-only worsening, knee-only worsening, or combined worsening in 48 months. Univariate comparisons and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the combined worsening group to the other groups. Results: Combined worsening occurred in 12.5% of participants. Compared to those with no worsening, the combined worsening group had more severe baseline radiographic knee OA (aOR: 1.38 (1.15–1.64)). Compared to hip-only OA worsening, the combined group had more severe knee OA (aOR: 1.36 (1.11–1.67)). Compared to those with knee-only OA worsening, combined OA worsening was associated with female sex (aOR: 1.92 (1.31–2.76)). Conclusions: Our findings show differences between individuals with combined or isolated OA worsening, which may reflect accumulation of single-joint risk factors rather than a distinct trajectory. This research provides a foundation for large-scale investigations into multi-joint OA subtypes to improve patient stratification and inform targeted interventions. ...

An individual participant data meta-analysis of 23 886 hips from the world COACH consortium

Journal article (2025) - Myrthe A. Van den Berg, Harbeer Ahedi, Amanda E. Nelson, Harrie Weinans, Rintje Agricola, More authors..., Nigel K. Arden, Flavia Cicutini, Timothy Cootes, Kay M. Crossley, David T. Felson, Willem Paul Gielis, Stefan Kluzek, John A. Lynch
Objective To assess the relationship between cam morphology and the development of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA), overall and in subgroups based on age, biological sex and body mass index (BMI). Methods Hips with no RHOA at baseline and with available follow-up during 4–8 years were selected from the Worldwide Collaboration on Osteoarthritis PrediCtion for the Hip (World COACH) consortium. Alpha angles were uniformly measured on anteroposterior radiographs, with a threshold of 60° used to define cam morphology. Incident RHOA was defined as the transition from an RHOA-free state at baseline to definite diagnosis of RHOA at follow-up. The association between baseline cam morphology and the development of RHOA was assessed using a three-level mixed-effects logistic regression model, accounting for hip side, individual and cohort-level variation. Results A total of 23 886 hips were included (mean age: 62.2±8.4 years; 70.6% female; BMI: 27.4±4.5; mean time to follow-up: 6.1±3.0 years). Cam morphology was associated with RHOA (OR: 1.87, 95%CI 1.36 to 2.59), as was a greater alpha angle (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.03 for every degree increase). The overall relative risk of developing RHOA in hips with cam morphology was 1.62 (95%CI 1.26 to 2.07), greatest for those aged 51–60 years (2.15, 95%CI 1.55 to 2.98) and higher in males (2.50, 95%CI 1.67 to 3.73), compared with females (1.75,95%CI 1.24 to 2.48). Conclusion Hips with cam morphology have higher odds of developing RHOA within 4–8 years compared with hips without cam morphology. The relative risk was highest in subgroups of participants aged 51–60 years and in males, making cam morphology a potential target for primary or secondary prevention of RHOA. ...