Environmental models and software are essential tools for understanding the complex interactions of the natural world. They empower us to foresee potential futures, unravel intricate trends and expand our scientific knowledge, ensuring we make informed decisions for a sustainable future. This includes environmental emissions and exposure models, which tell us how chemicals and other potential pollutants enter, move around and behave in the environment. To achieve accurate, efficient, collaborative and integrative insights into this pollution and its sources, it is imperative that our models and software keep pace with scientific and technological advances, the increasing availability of data and a heightened importance on assessing complex, interconnected systems under a changing climate. But often our models follow outmoded programming paradigms and technological setups that makes this difficult. They are often monolithic codebases rather than flexible, standalone modules, making them difficult to adapt to emerging risks or integrate with other models to predict, e.g., the societal drivers and One Health impacts of pollution. Furthermore, modelling efforts often overlook ethical and sustainability issues, like the carbon footprint of running complex simulations or the societal impacts of using model predictions to inform policy. These considerations framed a workshop that took place in October 2024, bringing together interdisciplinary environmental modellers from around the world to discuss the question: what does the next generation of environmental models look like?
The focus was interactive sessions, where participants discussed this question by referering to six pillars: Software engineering and collaborative platforms; Interdisciplinary learning; Cloud-based and exascale computing; Citizen science; Artificial intelligence, and; Big data and better monitoring. In this presentation, we reflect on the outcomes, placing them in the context of emissions and exposure modelling.
The workshop was part of broader efforts to build an international community of practice around environmental modelling. A priority identified is that training, education and knowledge transfer are vital to ensuring that we empower the next generation of environmental modellers, as well as the models themselves, and we hope this community will provide a space to enable this.

The EU crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV manufacturing industry has faced strong foreign competition in the last decade. To strive in this competitive environment and differentiate itself from the competition, the EU c-Si PV manufacturing industry needs to (1) focus on highly performing c-Si PV technologies, (2) include sustainability by design, and (3) develop differentiated PV module designs for a broad range of PV applications to tap into rapidly growing existing and new markets. This is precisely the aim of the 3.5 years long H2020 funded HighLite project, which started in October 2019 under the work program LC-SC3-RES-15-2019: Increase the competitiveness of the EU PV manufacturing industry. To achieve this goal, the HighLite project focuses on bringing two advanced PV module designs and the related manufacturing solutions to higher technology readiness levels (TRL). The first module design aims to combine the benefits of n-type silicon heterojunction (SHJ) cells (high efficiency and bifaciality potential, improved sustainability, rapidly growing supply chain in the EU) with the ones of shingle assembly (higher packing density, improved modularity, and excellent aesthetics). The second module design is based on the assembly of low-cost industrial interdigitated back-contact (IBC) cells cut in half or smaller, which is interesting to improve module efficiencies and increase modularity (key for application in buildings, vehicles, etc.). This contribution provides an overview of the key results achieved so far by the HighLite project partners and discusses their relevance to help raise the EU PV industries' competitiveness. We report on promising high-efficiency industrial cell results (24.1% SHJ cell with a shingle layout and 23.9% IBC cell with passivated contacts), novel approaches for high-throughput laser cutting and edge re-passivation, module designs for BAPV, BIPV, and VIPV applications passing extended testing, and first 1-year outdoor monitoring results compared with benchmark products.