Underground hydrogen storage in porous formations is a promising solution for large-scale energy storage. Understanding hydrogen flow and trapping at the pore-scale is crucial for assessing storage capacity and recovery efficiency. While pore-scale flow visualisation experiments provide realistic insights, they are resource intensive and technically challenging. Pore-network models offer a computationally efficient tool for simulating multiphase flow in porous media and can serve as a valuable complement to pore-scale experiments. However, their accuracy remains a key uncertainty and must be evaluated for future application. This study evaluates the performance of a quasi-static pore-network model by comparing its predictions against three-dimensional pore-scale hydrogen flow visualisation experiments in a homogeneous Bentheimer sandstone and a layered Clashach sandstone. The model was calibrated to match experimental end-state saturations, and its performance was evaluated through comparisons of spatial saturation profiles and pore occupancy. The novelty of this study lies in the direct comparison of hydrogen displacement between pore-scale experimental observations and pore-network model simulations, providing an assessment of model performance under varying degrees of rock heterogeneity relevant to underground hydrogen storage. The pore-network model shows good agreement with experimental observations for the homogeneous rock, particularly during drainage, and is subsequently used to analyse additional scenarios, including cyclic hydrogen injection and withdrawal, and wettability variations. These simulations provide insights into capillary pressure behaviour and residual saturation trends. In contrast, for the heterogeneous and layered Clashach sandstone, the model fails to capture the trapping and fluid redistribution observed experimentally during imbibition, revealing limitations in modelling fine-scale heterogeneity.