BACKGROUND Anaesthetic gases are an important source of greenhouse gas emissions from operating theatres and can attribute significantly to the carbon footprint of a nation's healthcare system. OBJECTIVE To estimate the magnitude of the climate impact of inhaled anaesthetics in the Netherlands. Furthermore, the goal was to assess the preferences of Dutch anaesthesiologists for anaesthesia techniques, and to explore opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions due to anaesthesia practice. DESIGN A 2019 bottom-up purchase analysis of inhalation anaesthetics used in all of the Dutch hospitals was executed and an online survey was conducted among Dutch anaesthesiologists regarding their preferences for anaesthetic agents. RESULTS Purchasing quantities of volatile anaesthetic agents were obtained from 61 of the 69 hospital organisations in the Netherlands (response rate 88.4%). A total of 12.2 kilotons CO2 equivalent (0.07% of the Dutch healthcare system) was emitted due to inhalation anaesthetics in the Netherlands in 2019. The volume of the in 2019 purchased inhalation volatile anaesthetics was 9.178 l of sevoflurane (93.4%), 404 l of desflurane (4.1%) and 245 l of isoflurane (2.5%). The survey in which 182 anaesthesiologists participated demonstrated that propofol was the first drug of choice of 70% of respondents, desflurane was available in 16% of Dutch hospitals and 83% of anaesthesiologists answered never using desflurane. Nitrous oxide was not used by 63% of respondents, the remaining 27% reported using nitrous oxide only in less than 5% of their cases. CONCLUSION The relatively low emission of greenhouse gases due to inhalation anaesthetics in Dutch healthcare compared to other countries can be explained by the limited use of nitrous oxide and desflurane by Dutch anaesthesiologists and their strong preference for intravenously administered propofol as an anaesthetic.

Educational challenge: Medical education must equip future professionals with the necessary skills to navigate the complex healthcare landscape. Clinical knowledge is essential, and critical and creative thinking skills are vital to meet the challenges of the system. Design thinking offers a structured approach that integrates creativity and innovation, yet its application in medical education is absent. Solution and implementation: The compulsory MasterMinds Challenge course at Leiden University Medical Center utilizes design thinking principles to address real world healthcare challenges. Final-year medical students participated in a two-day program. The course encompassed empathizing with stakeholders, problem definition, ideation, prototyping, and refining solutions. Presentation skills were emphasized, culminating in a symposium where teams showcase their outcomes. Implementation of the MasterMinds Challenge course was successful with 33 sessions delivered to 1217 medical students. Challenges covered various healthcare topics, yielding creative yet practical outcomes. Students appreciate the real world healthcare challenge, team-based approach, and the applicability of design thinking principles. Challenge owners expressed satisfaction with students’ commitment, creativity, and empathizing abilities. Lessons learned and next steps: To further enhance the MasterMinds Challenge course, a more longitudinal format is being designed, enabling greater autonomy and emphasizing the refining and implementation phases. The course can be extended to medical postgraduate professionals and interdisciplinary collaborations, fostering innovative ideas beyond current practices. By developing problem-solving skills, the MasterMinds Challenge course contributes to a future-proof medical education program and prepares students to meet the evolving needs of healthcare.