End-to-side anastomoses are commonly utilised in peripheral arterial bypass surgery and are plagued by high rates of re-stenosis which are contributed to by non-physiological blood flow impacting the arterial and graft structures. Computational simulations can examine how patient-specific surgical decisions in bypass graft placement and material selection affect blood flow and future risk of graft restenosis. Despite graft geometry and compliance being key predictors of restenosis, current simulations of femoro-popliteal artery grafts do not consider the interaction of flowing blood with compliant vessel, graft, and suture structures. Utilising fluid–structure interaction simulations, this study examines the impact of surgical technique, such as anastomosis angle, graft material, and suture material, on blood flow and fluid–structure forces in patient-specific asymptomatic arterial tree versus side-to-end peripheral grafts for symptomatic atherosclerotic disease. To render these complex simulations numerically feasible, our pipeline uses regional suture mechanics and a pre-stress pipeline previously validated in small-scale idealised models. Our simulations found that higher anastomosis angles generate larger regions of slow and recirculating blood, characterised by non-physiologically low shear stress and high oscillatory shear index. The use of compliant graft materials reduces regions of non-physiologically high shear stress only when used in combination with compliant suture materials. Altogether, our fluid–structure interaction simulation provides patient-specific platforms for vascular surgery decisions concerning graft geometry and material.

Vascular compliance is considered both a cause and a consequence of cardiovascular disease and a significant factor in the mid- and long-term patency of vascular grafts. However, the biomechanical effects of localised changes in compliance cannot be satisfactorily studied with the available medical imaging technologies or surgical simulation materials. To address this unmet need, we developed a coupled silico-vitro platform which allows for the validation of numerical fluid-structure interaction results as a numerical model and physical prototype. This numerical one-way and two-way fluid-structure interaction study is based on a three-dimensional computer model of an idealised femoral artery which is validated against patient measurements derived from the literature. The numerical results are then compared with experimental values collected from compliant arterial phantoms via direct pressurisation and ring tensile testing. Phantoms within a compliance range of 1.4–68.0%/100 mmHg were fabricated via additive manufacturing and silicone casting, then mechanically characterised via ring tensile testing and optical analysis under direct pressurisation with moderately statistically significant differences in measured compliance ranging between 10 and 20% for the two methods. One-way fluid-structure interaction coupling underestimated arterial wall compliance by up to 14.7% compared with two-way coupled models. Overall, Solaris™ (Smooth-On) matched the compliance range of the numerical and in vivo patient models most closely out of the tested silicone materials. Our approach is promising for vascular applications where mechanical compliance is especially important, such as the study of diseases which commonly affect arterial wall stiffness, such as atherosclerosis, and the model-based design, surgical training, and optimisation of vascular prostheses.