This paper presents new developments in meshless local Petrov–Galerkin with Rankine source (MLPG_R) particle based method for studying interaction of waves with fixed structures in a numerical wave-tank. A new 3D formulation of the Lagrangian flow problem for incompressible fluid with optimised solution strategy is presented. The pressure Poisson equation is solved in local weak-form with integration done semi-analytically using a new symmetric expression. The wave-generation is done using one-way coupling with a 2D fully-nonlinear potential theory based finite-element model. Further a simple identification method for free-surface particles is proposed, which is shown to work well in vicinity of the structure. The solid-wall boundary condition is treated using ghost and mirror particles for accurate calculation of gradients. The waterline on domain boundary faces is treated using a tangentially moving side-wall approach which makes this particle based scheme capable of capturing small amplitude waves and focusing waves. The paper briefly presents experimental setup used for studying the interaction of a fixed emergent cylinder with uni-directional regular and focusing waves in 3D. The numerical model is validated against results from this experiment. An analysis is conducted on parameters related to local integration domain, wave-making coupling algorithm, particle distribution and time-step. This work highlights the use of hybrid approach for efficient and accurate simulation of waves-structure interaction.

In this paper, the comparative study carried out for focused wave interaction with a moving cylinder in ISOPE-2020 is reported. The fixed cylinder cases are reported in the companion paper as Part A (Sriram, Agarwal, Yan et al., 2021). The paper discusses qualitative and quantitative comparison between four different numerical solvers that participated in this comparative study. This is a challenging problem, as the cylinder moves over 40 m and interacts with the focusing waves. The performance of various solvers is compared for two different moving cylinder speeds. Both weakly coupled models and full Navier–Stokes (NS) solvers with different strategies for modeling the cylinder motion were adopted by the participants. In particular, different methods available for numerically simulating the forward speed problem emerge from this paper. The qualitative comparison based on the wave probe and pressure probe time histories between laminar and turbulent solvers is presented. Furthermore, the quantitative error analysis for individual solvers shows deviations up to 30% for moving wave probes and 50% for pressure time history. The reliability of each method is discussed based on all the wave probe and pressure probe discrepancies against experiments. The deviations for higher speed shown by all solvers indicate that further improvements in the modeling capabilities are required.