IS

Isabel Spriet

info

Please Note

2 records found

Development and External Validation of Three Novel (Machine Learning) Models

Journal article (2023) - André Wieringa, Tim Ewoldt, Ravish N. Gangapersad, Matthias Gijsen, Nestor Parolya, Chantal J. A. R. Kats , Isabel Spriet, Henrik Endeman, Jasper J. Haringman, More Authors...
In the intensive care unit (ICU), infection-related mortality is high. Although adequate antibiotic treatment is essential in infections, beta-lactam target non-attainment occurs in up to 45% of ICU patients, which is associated with a lower likelihood of clinical success. To optimize antibiotic treatment, we aimed to develop beta-lactam target non-attainment prediction models in ICU patients. Patients from two multicenter studies were included, with intravenous intermittent beta-lactam antibiotics administered and blood samples drawn within 12–36 h after antibiotic initiation. Beta-lactam target non-attainment models were developed and validated using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and naïve Bayes (NB) models from 376 patients. External validation was performed on 150 ICU patients. We assessed performance by measuring discrimination, calibration, and net benefit at the default threshold probability of 0.20. Age, sex, serum creatinine, and type of beta-lactam antibiotic were found to be predictive of beta-lactam target non-attainment. In the external validation, the RF, LR, and NB models confirmed good discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.79 [95% CI 0.72–0.86], 0.80 [95% CI 0.73–0.87], and 0.75 [95% CI 0.67–0.82], respectively, and net benefit in the RF and LR models. We developed prediction models for beta-lactam target non-attainment within 12–36 h after antibiotic initiation in ICU patients. These online-accessible models use readily available patient variables and help optimize antibiotic treatment. The RF and LR models showed the best performance among the three models tested. ...
Journal article (2021) - Matthias Gijsen, Benjamin Filtjens, Pieter Annaert, Yeghig Armoudjian, Yves Debaveye, Joost Wauters, Peter Slaets, Isabel Spriet
There are concerns about the stability of meropenem in plasma samples, even when frozen at −20 C. Previous smaller studies suggested significant degradation of meropenem at −20 C after 3–20 days. However, in several recent clinical studies, meropenem plasma samples were still stored at −20 C, or the storage temperature and/or time were not mentioned in the paper. The aim of this study was to describe and model meropenem degradation in human plasma at −20 C over 1 year. Stability of meropenem in human plasma at −20 C was investigated at seven concentrations (0.44, 4.38, 17.5, 35.1, 52.6, 70.1, and 87.6 mg/L) representative for the range of relevant concentrations encountered in clinical practice. For each concentration, samples were stored for 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, 84, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224, 252, 280, 308, 336, and 364 days at −20 C before being transferred to −80 C until analysis. Degradation was modeled using polynomial regression analysis and artificial neural network (ANN). Meropenem showed significant degradation over time in human plasma when stored at −20 C. Degradation was present over the whole concentration range and increased with higher concentrations until a concentration of 35.1 mg/L. Both models showed accurate prediction of meropenem degradation. In conclusion, this study provides detailed insights into the concentration-dependent degradation of meropenem in human plasma stored at −20 C over 1 year. Meropenem in human plasma is shown to be stable at least up to approximately 80 days when stored at −20 C. The polynomial model allows calculating original meropenem concentrations in samples stored for a known period of time at −20 C. ...