How to select MDAO workflows

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

Sebastian Sanchez Perez Moreno (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Michiel B Zaaijer (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Research Group
Wind Energy
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0654 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Wind Energy
Article number
AIAA 2018-0654
Event
AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2018 (2018-01-08 - 2018-01-12), Kissimmee, United States
Downloads counter
333
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Multidisciplinary Design Analysis and Optimisation (MDAO) workflows consist of coupled tools driven by an algorithm for a specific purpose, e.g. optimisation. MDAO users may have at their disposal a set of tools of varying levels of fidelity. As a result, many permutations or MDAO workflows may arise, for which no clear methodology exists to evaluate, compare and rank them based on their performance. Our research question is then how to find the most useful MDAO workflows for a given purpose. This paper provides a guideline for solving this multiple criteria decision analysis problem. Our guideline includes a method to define the criteria and metrics for evaluating the performance of MDAO workflows, a strategy to aggregate the scores, and an optimisation algorithm for
categorical variables used to find the best alternatives. We apply this guideline to the offshore wind farm layout optimisation problem to demonstrate its use. This case study evidenced how critical t

Files

How_to_select_mdao.pdf
(pdf | 0.761 Mb)
License info not available