Advancing youth co-design of ethical guidelines for AI-powered digital mental health tools

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

C. A. Figueroa (University of California, TU Delft - Information and Communication Technology)

G. Ramos (University of California)

A. M. Psihogios (Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine)

E. Ekuban (Be Ubuntu Foundation)

P. Bansie (Be Ubuntu Foundation)

M. de Haas (Be Ubuntu Foundation)

N. S. Karnik (University of Illinois at Chicago)

O. Ajilore (University of Illinois at Chicago)

E. E. Anderson (Loyola University Chicago)

C. Stiles-Shields (University of Illinois at Chicago)

Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00467-7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Journal title
Nature Mental Health
Issue number
8
Volume number
3
Pages (from-to)
870-878
Downloads counter
235
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) often face mental health challenges and are heavily influenced by technology. Digital health interventions (DHIs), leveraging smartphone data and artificial intelligence, offer immense potential for personalized and accessible mental health support. However, ethical guidelines for DHI research fail to address AYA’s unique developmental and technological needs and leave crucial ethical questions unanswered. This gap creates risks of either over- or under-protecting AYA in DHI research, slowing progress and causing harm. This Perspective examines ethical gaps in DHI research for AYA, focusing on three critical domains: challenges of passive data collection and artificial intelligence, consent practices, and risks of exacerbating inequities. We propose an agenda for ethical guidance based on bioethical principles autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence and justice, developed through participatory research with AYA, particularly marginalized groups. We discuss methodologies to achieve this agenda, ensuring ethical, youth-focused and equitable DHI research for the mental health of AYA.

Files

NMHpublication2025.pdf
(pdf | 1.22 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 30-01-2026
License info not available