Challenges and solutions for N-of-1 design studies in health psychology
Dominika Kwasnicka (Curtin University, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities)
Jennifer Inauen (Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)
Wim Nieuwenboom (University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland)
Johanna Nurmi (University of Cambridge, University of Helsinki)
A. Schneider (University College London)
Camille E. Short (University of Adelaide)
Tessa Dekkers (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)
A. Jess Williams (University of Birmingham)
Walter Bierbauer (Universitat Zurich)
Ari Haukkala (University of Helsinki)
Federica Picariello (King’s College London)
Felix Naughton (University of East Anglia)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Theories of behaviour change and health behaviour change interventions are most often evaluated in between-person designs. However, behaviour change theories apply to individuals not groups and behavioural interventions ultimately aim to achieve within-person rather than between-group change. Within-person methodology, such as N-of-1 (also known as single case design), can circumvent this issue, though has multiple design-specific challenges. This paper provides a conceptual review of the challenges and potential solutions for undertaking N-of-1 studies in health psychology. Key challenges identified include participant adherence to within-person protocols, carry-over and slow onset effects, suitability of behaviour change techniques for evaluation in N-of-1 experimental studies, optimal allocation sequencing and blinding, calculating power/sample size, and choosing the most suitable analysis approach. Key solutions include involving users in study design, employing recent technologies for unobtrusive data collection and problem solving by design. Within-person designs share common methodological requirements with conventional between-person designs but require specific methodological considerations. N-of-1 evaluation designs are appropriate for many though not all types of interventions. A greater understanding of patterns of behaviours and factors influencing behaviour change at the within-person level is required to progress health psychology into a precision science. Video abstract: Supplementary Material 1.