Mortality Attributable to Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter

Insights from the Epidemiologic Evidence for Understudied Locations

Review (2022)
Author(s)

Kyle J. Colonna (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

Petros Koutrakis (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

Patrick L. Kinney (Boston University School of Public Health)

Roger M. Cooke (Resources for the Future, TU Delft - Applied Probability)

John S. Evans (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

Research Group
Applied Probability
Copyright
© 2022 Kyle J. Colonna, Petros Koutrakis, Patrick L. Kinney, R.M. Cooke, John S. Evans
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08343
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Kyle J. Colonna, Petros Koutrakis, Patrick L. Kinney, R.M. Cooke, John S. Evans
Research Group
Applied Probability
Issue number
11
Volume number
56
Pages (from-to)
6799-6812
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Epidemiologic cohort studies have consistently demonstrated that long-term exposure to ambient fine particles (PM2.5) is associated with mortality. Nevertheless, extrapolating results to understudied locations may involve considerable uncertainty. To explore this issue, this review discusses the evidence for (i) the associated risk of mortality, (ii) the shape of the concentration-response function, (iii) a causal interpretation, and (iv) how the source mix/composition of PM2.5and population characteristics may alter the effect. The accumulated evidence suggests the following: (i) In the United States, the change in all-cause mortality risk per μg/m3is about 0.8%. (ii) The concentration-response function appears nonlinear. (iii) Causation is overwhelmingly supported. (iv) Fossil fuel combustion-related sources are likely more toxic than others, and age, race, and income may modify the effect. To illustrate the use of our findings in support of a risk assessment in an understudied setting, we consider Kuwait. However, given the complexity of this relationship and the heterogeneity in reported effects, it is unreasonable to think that, in such circumstances, point estimates can be meaningful. Consequently, quantitative probabilistic estimates, which cannot be derived objectively, become essential. Formally elicited expert judgment can provide such estimates, and this review provides the evidence to support an elicitation.

Files

Acs.est.1c08343.pdf
(pdf | 1.01 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-07-2023
License info not available