Impact of Hydrometeorological Events for the Selection of Parametric Models for Protozoan Pathogens in Drinking-Water Sources

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Émile Sylvestre (Polytechnique Montreal)

Jean Baptiste Burnet (Polytechnique Montreal)

Sarah Dorner (Polytechnique Montreal)

Patrick Smeets (KWR Water Research Institute)

Gertjan Medema (KWR Water Research Institute, TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Manuela Villion (Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment, and Fight Against Climate Change)

Mounia Hachad (Polytechnique Montreal)

Michèle Prévost (Polytechnique Montreal)

Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13612 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Sanitary Engineering
Issue number
8
Volume number
41
Pages (from-to)
1413-1426
Downloads counter
210

Abstract

Temporal variations in concentrations of pathogenic microorganisms in surface waters are well known to be influenced by hydrometeorological events. Reasonable methods for accounting for microbial peaks in the quantification of drinking water treatment requirements need to be addressed. Here, we applied a novel method for data collection and model validation to explicitly account for weather events (rainfall, snowmelt) when concentrations of pathogens are estimated in source water. Online in situ β-d-glucuronidase activity measurements were used to trigger sequential grab sampling of source water to quantify Cryptosporidium and Giardia concentrations during rainfall and snowmelt events at an urban and an agricultural drinking water treatment plant in Quebec, Canada. We then evaluate if mixed Poisson distributions fitted to monthly sampling data ((Formula presented.) = 30 samples) could accurately predict daily mean concentrations during these events. We found that using the gamma distribution underestimated high Cryptosporidium and Giardia concentrations measured with routine or event-based monitoring. However, the log-normal distribution accurately predicted these high concentrations. The selection of a log-normal distribution in preference to a gamma distribution increased the annual mean concentration by less than 0.1-log but increased the upper bound of the 95% credibility interval on the annual mean by about 0.5-log. Therefore, considering parametric uncertainty in an exposure assessment is essential to account for microbial peaks in risk assessment.