Optimal flight pattern debate for airborne wind energy systems: circular or figure of eight?

Abstract

This computational study compares the performance of circular and figure-of-eight flight patterns for fixed-wing ground-generation airborne wind energy (AWE) systems using a PID-based basic controller that effectively controls the kite during each pattern's pumping cycle in a MATLAB® Simulink® environment. A simple, adjustable control framework enables a steady analysis within consistent operational parameters, allowing for fair comparisons of power output, power quality, ground surface area requirements, and structural load impacts. Unlike for small lightweight kites, the simulation results reveal that when using the 150 m2 MegAWES reference kite, the power is not similar over different patterns. The circular flight pattern achieves the highest cycle-averaged power output in a smaller operational area, making it advantageous for maximising energy within limited spatial constraints. Conversely, the figure-of-eight down-loop pattern demonstrates superior power quality with lower power peaks and lower expected structural fatigue due to a reduced cyclic aerodynamic load frequency and amplitude, supporting greater operational stability and system longevity. The figure-of-eight up-loop does not stand out on any of the metrics considered in this work. This study offers insights into the trade-offs between energy output, efficiency, and structural demands associated with each flight path, providing a foundation for future AWE flight path selection and control strategy optimisations.