A time-series analysis framework for the flood-wave method to estimate groundwater model parameters

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Christophe Obergfell (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Mark Bakker (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Kees Maas (KWR Water Research Institute)

Research Group
Water Resources
Copyright
© 2016 C.C.A. Obergfell, M. Bakker, Kees Maas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1436-5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 C.C.A. Obergfell, M. Bakker, Kees Maas
Research Group
Water Resources
Issue number
7
Volume number
24
Pages (from-to)
1807–1819
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The flood-wave method is implemented within the framework of time-series analysis to estimate aquifer parameters for use in a groundwater model. The resulting extended flood-wave method is applicable to situations where groundwater fluctuations are affected significantly by time-varying precipitation and evaporation. Response functions for time-series analysis are generated with an analytic groundwater model describing stream–aquifer interaction. Analytical response functions play the same role as the well function in a pumping test, which is to translate observed head variations into groundwater model parameters by means of a parsimonious model equation. An important difference as compared to the traditional flood-wave method and pumping tests is that aquifer parameters are inferred from the combined effects of precipitation, evaporation, and stream stage fluctuations. Naturally occurring fluctuations are separated in contributions from different stresses. The proposed method is illustrated with data collected near a lowland river in the Netherlands. Special emphasis is put on the interpretation of the streambed resistance. The resistance of the streambed is the result of stream-line contraction instead of a semi-pervious streambed, which is concluded through comparison with the head loss calculated with an analytical two-dimensional cross-section model.