Multi-Objective Sustainability Optimization of Biomass Residues to Ethanol via Gasification and Syngas Fermentation: Trade-Offs between Profitability, Energy Efficiency, and Carbon Emissions

Journal Article (2021)
Authors

E. de Medeiros (University of Campinas, TU Delft - BT/Bioprocess Engineering)

HJ Noorman (TU Delft - BT/Bioprocess Engineering, DSM)

Rubens Maciel Filho (University of Campinas)

J.A. Posada-Duque (TU Delft - BT/Biotechnology and Society)

Research Group
BT/Bioprocess Engineering
Copyright
© 2021 E. Magalhaes de Medeiros, H.J. Noorman, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040201
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 E. Magalhaes de Medeiros, H.J. Noorman, Rubens Maciel Filho, J.A. Posada Duque
Research Group
BT/Bioprocess Engineering
Issue number
4
Volume number
7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040201
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This work presents a strategy for optimizing the production process of ethanol via integrated gasification and syngas fermentation, a conversion platform of growing interest for its contribution to carbon recycling. The objective functions (minimum ethanol selling price (MESP), energy efficiency, and carbon footprint) were evaluated for the combinations of different input variables in models of biomass gasification, energy production from syngas, fermentation, and ethanol distillation, and a multi-objective genetic algorithm was employed for the optimization of the integrated process. Two types of waste feedstocks were considered, wood residues and sugarcane bagasse, with the former leading to lower MESP and a carbon footprint of 0.93 USD/L and 3 g CO2eq/MJ compared
to 1.00 USD/L and 10 g CO2eq/MJ for sugarcane bagasse. The energy efficiency was found to be 32% in both cases. An uncertainty analysis was conducted to determine critical decision variables, which were found to be the gasification zone temperature, the split fraction of the unreformed syngas sent to the combustion chamber, the dilution rate, and the gas residence time in the bioreactor. Apart from the abovementioned objectives, other aspects such as water footprint, ethanol yield, and energy
self-sufficiency were also discussed.