Classification of bore patterns induced by storm waves overtopping a dike crest and their impact types on dike mounted vertical walls – A large-scale model study

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Maximilian Streicher (Universiteit Gent)

Andreas Kortenhaus (Universiteit Gent)

Krasimir Marinov (Student TU Delft)

Matthias Hirt (RWTH Aachen University)

Steven Hughes (Colorado State University)

Bas Hofland (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Babette Scheres (RWTH Aachen University)

Holger Schüttrumpf (RWTH Aachen University)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2019.1589635
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Issue number
3
Volume number
61
Pages (from-to)
321-339
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Short duration bores in the coastal zone are generated by wave breaking in shallow water and mild foreshore conditions. In storm weather situations and for sea level rise scenarios, these bores approach the dike and interact with previously overtopped or reflected bores. Combined laser scanner and video measurements were used to study the complex and turbulent bore interaction processes. Five bore interaction patterns were distinguished as (1) regular bore pattern; (2) collision bore pattern; (3) plunging breaking bore pattern; (4) sequential overtopping bore pattern, and (5) catch-up bore pattern. Video images of the bore running up the wall and motion tracking of the leading edge were used to obtain a time series of the run-up water at the wall. The impact loads of the bore hitting the wall on the promenade were studied based on the signal of a vertical array of 13 pressure sensors installed over the wall height. Three impact types were distinguished and classified as (1) impulsive impact type; (2) dynamic impact type; and (3) quasi-static impact type. The majority of ~2/3 of the total number of impacts were comprised of the quasi-static impact type.

Files

REVISED_MANUSCRIPT_2.pdf
(pdf | 2.91 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 03-04-2020
License info not available