Internationally Validated Open Access Indicators of Large Public Urban Green Space for Healthy and Sustainable Cities

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Ryan Turner (RMIT University)

Carl Higgs (RMIT University)

Vuokko Heikinheimo (Finnish Environment Institute)

Ruth Hunter (Queens University Belfast)

Júlio Celso Borello Vargas (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)

Shiqin Liu (University of Minnesota)

Eugen Resendiz (The University of Texas at Austin, Tecnologico de Monterrey)

Geoff Boeing (University of Southern California)

D. Adlakha (TU Delft - Urban Studies)

undefined More Authors

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.70023 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Journal title
Geographical Analysis
Issue number
4
Volume number
57
Pages (from-to)
793-808
Downloads counter
135
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Large public urban green spaces (LPUGS) provide multiple health and environmental co-benefits by mitigating urban heat, improving air quality and biodiversity, and promoting physical activity, social interactions, and mental wellbeing. There is a lack of accessible, evidence-informed, and internationally validated LPUGS indicators to assist with benchmarking and monitoring progress toward healthy and sustainable cities globally. This study developed and validated internationally applicable spatial indicators of LPUGS availability and accessibility that are directly relevant to health and sustainability outcomes. For 13 cities across 10 middle- to high-income countries, we identified LPUGS ≥ 1 ha by fusing OpenStreetMap and satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, and estimated residents' access within 500 m pedestrian network distance. We conducted a two-step validation process with local collaborators in each city. Our indicator methods identified LPUGS with greater than 80% accuracy for 12 of the 13 cities, and comparisons against official local reference data for four cities further demonstrated validity. While some open data limitations were identified, the indicators address critical gaps in existing methods by enabling standardized and comparable measurement of LPUGS in diverse cities internationally. Our customizable open-source global indicator tools can inform evidence-based green space planning for urban health and sustainability.