Foot progression angle estimation using a single foot-worn inertial sensor

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Frank J. Wouda (University of Twente)

Stephan L.J.O. Jaspar (University of Twente)

Jaap Harlaar (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control, Amsterdam UMC)

Bert Jan F. van Beijnum (University of Twente)

Peter H. Veltink (University of Twente)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2021 Frank J. Wouda, Stephan L.J.O. Jaspar, J. Harlaar, Bert Jan F. van Beijnum, Peter H. Veltink
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00816-4
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Frank J. Wouda, Stephan L.J.O. Jaspar, J. Harlaar, Bert Jan F. van Beijnum, Peter H. Veltink
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
1
Volume number
18
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: The foot progression angle is an important measure used to help patients reduce their knee adduction moment. Current measurement systems are either lab-bounded or do not function in all environments (e.g., magnetically distorted). This work proposes a novel approach to estimate foot progression angle using a single foot-worn inertial sensor (accelerometer and gyroscope). Methods: The approach uses a dynamic step frame that is recalculated for the stance phase of each step to calculate the foot trajectory relative to that frame, to minimize effects of drift and to eliminate the need for a magnetometer. The foot progression angle (FPA) is then calculated as the angle between walking direction and the dynamic step frame. This approach was validated by gait measurements with five subjects walking with three gait types (normal, toe-in and toe-out). Results: The FPA was estimated with a maximum mean error of ~ 2.6° over all gait conditions. Additionally, the proposed inertial approach can significantly differentiate between the three different gait types. Conclusion: The proposed approach can effectively estimate differences in FPA without requiring a heading reference (magnetometer). This work enables feedback applications on FPA for patients with gait disorders that function in any environment, i.e. outside of a gait lab or in magnetically distorted environments.