Gravity Balancing Flexure Spring Mechanisms for Shoulder Support in Assistive Orthoses

Journal article (2022)

Authors

Martin Tschiersky University of Twente
Edsko E.G. Hekman University of Twente
J.L. Herder Precision and Microsystems Engineering
Dannis M. Brouwer University of Twente
Department
Precision and Microsystems Engineering
Copyright: © 2022 Martin Tschiersky, Edsko E.G. Hekman, J.L. Herder, Dannis M. Brouwer
DOI
help_outline
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2022.3155293
Gravity Biomimetics Kinematics Shoulder Gravity balancing Wearable device Exoskeletons Springs Arms Assistive orthosis Flexure spring. Shoulder support
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2022

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Department

Precision and Microsystems Engineering

Abstract

Passive shoulder supports show large potential for a wide range of applications, such as assisting activities of daily living and supporting work-related tasks. The rigid-link architecture used in currently available devices, however, may pose an obstacle to finding designs that offer low protrusion and close-to-body alignment. This study explores the use of mechanisms that employ a flexible element which connects the supported arm to an attachment at the back and acts as energy storage, transmission and part of the load bearing structure. Based on the synthesis method explained in this paper, a large scope investigation into possible flexure-based mechanism topologies is conducted. Thereby, many potential designs are discovered, which are presented, categorized and compared. Two promising designs are developed into prototypes, and are built and tested on a dedicated test bench. These two mechanisms reduce the necessary moment to lift the arm by more than 80 % throughout 85 % of the range of motion, while staying within 18 cm and 10 cm distance from the body, respectively. The study indicates that, due to its lower protrusion and interface loads, a design with a tapered flexure connecting the upper arm via a hinge to a spring-loaded slider at the back offers the most promising solution.