Numerical Analysis of Multirotor Aerodynamic Interactions in Forward and Transition Flight

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

K. Combey (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering, Université Internationale de Rabat)

Omer A. Elsayed (Université Internationale de Rabat)

Khaoula Qaissi (Université Internationale de Rabat)

Hajar Chouiyakh (Université Internationale de Rabat)

Research Group
Wind Energy
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C038518 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Wind Energy
Journal title
Journal of Aircraft: devoted to aeronautical science and technology
Issue number
3
Volume number
63
Pages (from-to)
959-975
Downloads counter
42
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The growing demand for urban air mobility (UAM) has accelerated the development of hybrid/electric vertical takeoff and landing (H-/eVTOL) aircraft, which use distributed propulsion systems that generate complex aerodynamic interactions during forward and transition flight. This study investigates the aerodynamic interactions between two propellers arranged in a one-after-another (OAA) configuration, using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations coupled with the k-ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model. The numerical setup was validated against experimental data for the isolated propeller across all investigated advance ratios, showing good agreement. Results reveal that, in forward flight, the rear propeller experiences up to 24% thrust and 20% power loss due to the disturbed airflow created by the wake of the front propeller. This is accompanied by only a 21% increase in axial velocity at the rear propeller location, indicating less effective energy transfer and lower thrust. Pressure coefficient analysis at the rear propeller midspan within the overlap region indicates increased flow separation and lower local loading. During transition, the overlap decreases with tilt, yet at 30° and 60°, the rear propeller still loses up to 11% thrust and 10% power due to slipstream deflection. As the propeller tilt angle increases, the thrust in the propeller axis direction also increases; however, this requires more power and generates a more complex slipstream. These findings provide valuable insights into wake interactions and their influence on rear propeller performance, offering practical design guidelines to improve the efficiency and reliability of UAM vehicles.

Files

03_2025_J_Combey-et-al-2025-nu... (pdf)
(pdf | 35.9 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 16-03-2026
License info not available