Degradation of structural aircraft coatings in cyclic salt spray testing, outdoor exposure, and in-service environments

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

A. J. Cornet (TU Delft - Team Arjan Mol)

A. M. Homborg (TU Delft - Team Arjan Mol, Netherlands Defence Academy)

L. ‘t Hoen-Velterop (Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre)

J. M.C. Mol (TU Delft - Team Arjan Mol)

Research Group
Team Arjan Mol
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-025-01190-9
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Team Arjan Mol
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Developing accelerated exposure tests that accurately predict the in-service performance of structural aircraft coatings remains challenging, largely due to the complexity of simulating real-world environmental conditions without altering key degradation mechanisms. This study evaluated four different coating systems under various accelerated exposure tests and compared their degradation behavior to in-service performance. Coating degradation was characterized using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Under in-service conditions, failure was primarily driven by the leaching of corrosion inhibitors, while the polymer matrix degraded predominantly through hydrolysis and thermo-oxidation. In contrast, during outdoor- or cyclic salt spray exposure, inhibitor leaching remained a key contributor to coating degradation although polymer degradation was mainly caused by ultraviolet radiation or hydrolysis. These findings emphasize the challenge of replicating real-world degradation in laboratory settings. Additionally, anodized oxide layers containing polymers within their pores played a critical role in maintaining protection during early coating failure. Chromate-based systems restored barrier properties, likely through chromate adsorption on hydrolyzed products within the oxide pores. In comparison, praseodymium-based systems failed to restore protection, while lithium-based systems sustained protection through an intact polymer.