When Debit=Credit, The Balance Constraint in Bookkeeping, Its Causes and Consequences for Accounting

Preprint (2020)
Author(s)

S. Renes (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624726 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Publisher
SSRN
Downloads counter
96

Abstract

This paper studies the balance constraint (debit=credit) in bookkeeping, its causes and its consequences for accounting. Balance in the ledger is shown to: 1) imply balance in journal entries and vice versa; 2) link the value definitions in the earnings statement and balance sheet; 3) have direct implications for valuation puzzles encountered in accounting, like accounting for OCI or stock-based compensation, and the difference between earnings or balance-sheet approaches to valuation. These system-wide effects on accounting highlight a design question: why do we have the balance constraint in bookkeeping? Backward-engineering shows 6 axioms that logically lead to double-entry bookkeeping. The balance constraint follows from the existence of a residual account: owner's equity. A class of equivalently powerful record keeping systems is shown to exist. These systems use double-entry bookkeeping without the monetary-unit assumption and can be used to record other outputs of the organization, like societal impact. These systems can be implemented in relational databases, a blockchain, or a different technology all together. The discussion covers links with other mathematical descriptions of bookkeeping and potential avenues for future research in the mathematics of bookkeeping