Attentional control, rumination and recurrence of depression

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Caroline A. Figueroa (Universiteit van Amsterdam, University of California)

Hannah DeJong (University of Oxford)

Roel J.T. Mocking (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Elaine Fox (University of Oxford)

Maaike M. Rive (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Aart H. Schene (Radboud University Medical Center)

Alan Stein (University of Oxford)

Henricus G. Ruhé (University of California, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Radboud University Medical Center)

Affiliation
External organisation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.072
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Volume number
256
Pages (from-to)
364-372

Abstract

Background: Depressive recurrence is highly prevalent and adds significantly to the burden of depressive disorder. Whilst some clinical predictors of recurrence have been clearly demonstrated (e.g. residual symptoms, previous episodes), the cognitive and psychological processes that may contribute to recurrence risk are less well established. In this study we examine whether cognitive flexibility deficits and rumination are related to recurrence in a remitted clinical sample. Method: We compared remitted patients with 2 or more previous depressive episodes (N = 69) to a matched group of healthy controls (N = 43). Cognitive flexibility was measured using the Internal Shift Task (IST) and a version of the Exogenous Cueing Task (ECT); rumination was assessed with the Ruminative Responses Scale. Results: IST and ECT performance did not differ between remitted patients and controls. Remitted patients had higher levels of rumination than controls. Within the remitted patient group, faster disengagement from angry and happy faces on the ECT was predictive of shorter time to recurrence (hazard ratio for 1 standard deviation, (HRSD) = 0.563 [CI, 0.381–0.832], p = 0.004, (HRSD) = 0.561 [CI, 0.389–0.808], p = 0.002, respectively). Rumination predicted recurrence (HRSD = 1.526 [CI, 1.152–2.202]; p = 0.003) but was not related to emotional disengagement. Limitations: We had low power to detect small effects for the analysis within remitted patients. Conclusions: Whilst cognitive flexibility in remitted patients was not impaired relative to controls, rapid disengagement from emotional stimuli and rumination were independently associated with time to recurrence. Cognitive flexibility may be an important indicator of recurrence risk, and a target for interventions to reduce recurrence.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.